Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Junior Member neverbirdie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Brookville, Ohio
    Posts
    20
    Thanked: 1

    Default Lapping Norton 4000/8000

    After what seemed like forever lapping away on 200 grit and 320 paper the stone looks great except for two small corners. I don't know if you can see in the pic (I don't know how to make it bigger), but there is no way I'll get that worked down with sandpaper. Should I go ahead and get a DMT or will it not be a problem. On the good side I was able to skip my arm workout for the day after working on this forever. Thanks for any help.



    Name:  Band Fall 2011 291.jpg
Views: 720
Size:  30.8 KBName:  Band Fall 2011 293.jpg
Views: 649
Size:  16.6 KB

  2. #2
    Senior Member eleblu05's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    baltimore md
    Posts
    1,066
    Thanked: 242

    Default

    that will be fine it's a low spot on the edge it wont be a problem while your honing a dmt imo is faster

  3. #3
    Senior Member eleblu05's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    baltimore md
    Posts
    1,066
    Thanked: 242

    Default

    one more thing a dmt is super flat so you wont have to worry about if the stone is truely flat

  4. #4
    Razor Vulture sharptonn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Lone Star State
    Posts
    25,827
    Thanked: 8588

    Default

    Those are some workhorses! I like them! I recommend a worn out dmt325 to flatten them, under running water, every razor or 3. No doing grids, just watching color. Doesn't take much. I find better uses for worn ones( DMT's) than new ones. Unless, of course, you are removing chips! Then a new DMT is fast!
    Last edited by sharptonn; 01-17-2012 at 02:24 AM.
    "Don't be stubborn. You are missing out".
    I rest my case.

  5. #5
    The Electrochemist PhatMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Hastings, UK
    Posts
    1,714
    Thanked: 527

    Default

    neverbirdie,

    You have plenty of surface area to hone on, so don't worry about the extreme edges

    Many natural stones come like that and are none the worse for it !

    Have fun !

    Best regards

    Russ

  6. #6
    . Bill S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Richfield, Ohio
    Posts
    2,521
    Thanked: 597

    Default

    If the 4K side of your stone feels nice and smooth with no granularity in the surface you are probably good to go. With my Norton 4/8 I had to lap about an eighth of an inch off of the 4K side to get the surface smooth enough. This was well in excess of what was required to get it flat, but necessary to get the stone working properly.

    I would also recommend putting a little more radius on the edges of the stone. You don't want sharp corners.

  7. #7
    Enthusiast Gammaray's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Chattanooga, TN
    Posts
    347
    Thanked: 103

    Default

    The corners are no problem. You will rarely even approach them while sharpening. The 4k side does require some work to get it working right. I lap with 3M220 on certified flat granite, then I finish the 4k side with 2000 grit just to smooth out the surface. It leaves the stone ready to use.

  8. #8
    Member kamikazeproject's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    97
    Thanked: 18

    Default

    Yep, the top layer of those Nortons can be kinda sandy. Somebody told me once that the older ones didn't used to be like that; anybody know if there's any truth to that... and if there is, why they are now?

  9. #9
    Junior Member neverbirdie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Brookville, Ohio
    Posts
    20
    Thanked: 1

    Default

    Thanks for all the input, everyone. Except for those corners they feel great. I was really surprised how rough they were when new. I may hit them with 320 one more time, then get out a razor and give it a try.

  10. #10
    . Bill S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Richfield, Ohio
    Posts
    2,521
    Thanked: 597

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kamikazeproject View Post
    Somebody told me once that the older ones didn't used to be like that; anybody know if there's any truth to that... and if there is, why they are now?
    Mine is about 5 years old, so it probably wouldn't qualify as an "old" Norton, but the 4K was quite textured when I got it. It had sort a linear pattern on the surface and was fairly porous and granular once I had lapped off the very top layer. For what it's worth, mine predates the relocation of the Norton production facility to Mexico, so that doesn't explain it.

    I really think that the issue is that honing razors is on the extreme end of what typically gets honed on a Norton stone so we are more sensitized to surface issues. More of a need to tune the tool for our use than it is an indication of a bad tool.

    Lynn could shed the most light on this. I think he's worn out a couple of dozen 4K/8K stones and has probably noticed a few changes over the years.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •