Results 1 to 10 of 62
Like Tree28Likes

Thread: What is Grit in Japanese Natural Stones, and How Important Is It.

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Senior Member Vasilis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Thessaloniki, Greece
    Posts
    885
    Thanked: 202

    Default

    I do like the idea of checking the edge with under a microscope, but, I'm not sure if you will need a 400x or more microscope. Steel has its limits, and you can see them at 50x. With 2000 magnification, if you look straight at the edge, it looks flat, not sharp, no matter the abrasive material you use. For broken glass, you might be able to see for edge a line of single molecules, but for steel, that's as fine as it can get...

  2. #2
    alx
    alx is offline
    Senior Member alx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Sonoma, California
    Posts
    418
    Thanked: 405

    Default

    I am game, but need a game plan. Alx

  3. #3
    Still Learning ezpz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    manitoba canada
    Posts
    393
    Thanked: 41

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vasilis View Post
    I do like the idea of checking the edge with under a microscope, but, I'm not sure if you will need a 400x or more microscope. Steel has its limits, and you can see them at 50x. With 2000 magnification, if you look straight at the edge, it looks flat, not sharp, no matter the abrasive material you use. For broken glass, you might be able to see for edge a line of single molecules, but for steel, that's as fine as it can get...
    50x is the most magnification needed to show all the significant detail of a razors edge? really? then why do all these pics at at even higher magnification seem to be grossly lacking in detail? the resolving power of the microscope or the focal range?
    WONDER PHOTOS REVEAL UNSUSPECTED FACTS ABOUT Razor Blades and Shaving (Oct, 1931)
    maybe you are thinking of the above article? i dont think 50x shows the detail of the steel to its limit.
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/79125884/K...arpening-Study
    i think this may explain why you find 50x sufficient, but why i dont think it is.
    Last edited by ezpz; 03-03-2012 at 07:13 AM.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to ezpz For This Useful Post:

    Vasilis (03-03-2012)

  5. #4
    Senior Member Vasilis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Thessaloniki, Greece
    Posts
    885
    Thanked: 202

    Default

    No, I wasn't thinking a specific article. But i will read those. I am sure that at 2000x magnification we will see many more details, and they do look really cool. But this 50x, it's enough to show us if it's sharp enough for shaving. and the scratch pattern of the hones. As I said on my last post, and looking the pictures of the article, the edge of the sharpest razor under a 2000x magnification looks like half melted cheese. And the surface you see is just the 1/10000th of the whole length of the razor. to check the rest of the edge, it will take you hours. Of course, the higher the magnification, the more details you are able to see, but for the purpose of finding a very very fine hone, and checking the edge, with a 50x we will see enough details.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •