Dullness of razors, Article 1854

[Martin103]

A small article from 1854, does this make sense to anybody?

[ace]

I'm just hoping that the particles in my razor don't go moving anywhere real far away. I'm going to need the darn thing tomorrow.

[dave5225]

Sounds like a lot of hogwash , and double talk , to me . I can't really make heads or tails out of what the person is saying , but I think the gist of it is that instead of a 7 day set , you need a 20 day set of razors .

[gssixgun]

Yep 20 day set is what I read too

[onimaru55]

I think he's referring to the quantum physics side of honing.

[JimmyHAD]

I think he's referring to the quantum physics side of honing.

Did they say if a "honemeister" honed it to start with ? Would it pass HHT ..........

[WW243]

shhhhhhhhhhhhhh you'll wake my razors.

[onimaru55]

Did they say if a "honemeister" honed it to start with ? Would it pass HHT ..........

If the honemeister was Schrodinger we would have to accept that the razor was both honed & not honed simultaneously.

[Cangooner]

Sounds like a lot of hogwash , and double talk , to me . I can't really make heads or tails out of what the person is saying , but I think the gist of it is that instead of a 7 day set , you need a 20 day set of razors .

Excellent! My RAD has been justified by Scientific American!

[scap99]

If the honemeister was Schrodinger we would have to accept that the razor was both honed & not honed simultaneously.

And yet another way to skin a cat. Lol