Thread: Dullness of razors, Article 1854

A small article from 1854, does this make sense to anybody?

I'm just hoping that the particles in my razor don't go moving anywhere real far away. I'm going to need the darn thing tomorrow.

Sounds like a lot of hogwash , and double talk , to me . I can't really make heads or tails out of what the person is saying , but I think the gist of it is that instead of a 7 day set , you need a 20 day set of razors .

Yep 20 day set is what I read too

I think he's referring to the quantum physics side of honing.

Originally Posted by onimaru55

I think he's referring to the quantum physics side of honing.

Did they say if a "honemeister" honed it to start with ? Would it pass HHT ..........

shhhhhhhhhhhhhh you'll wake my razors.

Originally Posted by JimmyHAD

Did they say if a "honemeister" honed it to start with ? Would it pass HHT ..........

If the honemeister was Schrodinger we would have to accept that the razor was both honed & not honed simultaneously.

Originally Posted by dave5225

Sounds like a lot of hogwash , and double talk , to me . I can't really make heads or tails out of what the person is saying , but I think the gist of it is that instead of a 7 day set , you need a 20 day set of razors .

Excellent! My RAD has been justified by Scientific American!

Originally Posted by onimaru55

If the honemeister was Schrodinger we would have to accept that the razor was both honed & not honed simultaneously.

And yet another way to skin a cat. Lol