Results 21 to 30 of 37
-
01-05-2015, 05:05 PM #21
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Des Moines
- Posts
- 8,664
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 2591Here is one that is very reasonably priced and has metal body (hopefully a sign of not being cheaply made otherwise)
10X-20X-30X-60X Sharp Stereo Microscope + USB Camera
I planned to get it to use, but things got in the way so it is on the "to buy" list when the time comes.Stefan
-
01-05-2015, 06:08 PM #22
I see Amazon has another that is similar:
Do you find it easy to be able to view the edge with the micromax?
Anyone have thoughts on the digital ones that are available (kinda cool to be able to capture to compare before/after)? Some reviews seems to indicate that they don't magnify as advertised, so wondering if it is worth it. Like:
http://www.amazon.com/AGPtek%C2%AE-D...Y0HTBZ8KEN787G
Thoughts?Regards,
PCM
-
01-05-2015, 06:15 PM #23
-
01-05-2015, 06:18 PM #24
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Des Moines
- Posts
- 8,664
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 2591Those digital microscopes are a PITA to use to see edges. If you can figure out to keep the blade steady while looking at it, then they will work decently IMHO.
Thing is when honing, you'd need to take a quick peak at the bevels and figure out what to do next. Fixing a blade, and refocusing a microscope every # of strokes does not seem too practical. YMMVStefan
-
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mainaman For This Useful Post:
cudarunner (01-05-2015), Wolfpack34 (01-05-2015)
-
01-05-2015, 06:19 PM #25
-
01-05-2015, 06:21 PM #26
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Rochester, MN
- Posts
- 11,544
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 3795I think that is the one Lynn has so you should check with him. I am spoiled by the resolution of my scope so I did not care for what I saw in that one, but it does make your honing look better than in mine!
OCD is right about resolution being more important than magnification.
if you can find a cheap used Brock Magiscope I highly suggest you buy it. It is a transmission scope so the image is reversed but it has very good optics for a teaching scope. Also, the scopes that were at ashville and latest KC meetups were pretty good too. Does anyone recall ID for that scope?Last edited by Utopian; 01-05-2015 at 06:24 PM.
-
01-05-2015, 06:22 PM #27
-
01-05-2015, 06:35 PM #28
Ok, Here's my 2 cents on this. A very inexpensive loupe will give you all you need to get started. Just like a Norton 4/8K will get you started honing. Then after a period of time you may find that the higher magnifications will be a helpful tool. But just like the Norton 4/8K until you learn to use it then buying a higher grade hone is a waste of money!
I'd hope that Ron will agree that to the uneducated a look through his high resolution microscope would simply baffle them as they wouldn't know what they are looking for.
With a simple 30-40X loupe someone new to honing can see if they are getting a proper bevel or is they are missing some area.
I hope this has been of some help.Our house is as Neil left it- an Aladdin’s cave of 'stuff'.
Kim X
-
01-05-2015, 06:42 PM #29
I like to keep it simple and battery free. I love my Belomo 12X.
-
01-06-2015, 12:01 AM #30
I don't know about that.
Someone driving around in a Yugo and liking it then gets into a lexus and I think they would be very happy with the change.
As long as you're in a lower power range better quality will just look better. Maybe if you went with a high grade 300x microscope it might do more harm than good for a rookie because he wouldn't what a good edge should look like at that power.No matter how many men you kill you can't kill your successor-Emperor Nero