Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22
Like Tree34Likes

Thread: Which 1k to buy: Chosera vs Superstone?

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Ponca City, Oklahoma
    Posts
    605
    Thanked: 66

    Default

    I have had my Chosera 1000 for about 5 years and love it, Just today my "Professional 3000" arrived, it is the new version of the Chosera. It is thinner (although thicker than a SS) and lacks all the Japanese writing stamped into it, which I don't like, for some reason I loved the stamping on my 1k, even though its mostly gone now.

    As many others have said, if your restoring razors then it comes in handy, if not get the SS, in the end it will be the same thing just slower.

  2. #12
    At this point in time... gssixgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    North Idaho Redoubt
    Posts
    27,026
    Thanked: 13245
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    One thing that needs to be noted is that most of the reviews and comparisons on here are between the older series of Naniwa Hones

    ie:

    It was Chosera vs Super Stone

    It is now Professional vs Specialty Stone and there are differences, most of them to the Specialty Stone series, making them a bit better then the older Super Stones..

    Just tossing the monkey wrench of truth into the convo

    Both work and they work well


    Another thing to keep in mind is the "Speed" which experienced honers are saying is Great that is because they are experienced honers and speed is a good thing.. Speed to a newer honer is not really a good thing in fact it is usually the exact opposite


    Just giving you perspective, the good news is that there is no "Bad" choice here, they are both excellent hones

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to gssixgun For This Useful Post:

    400E (05-28-2016)

  4. #13
      Lynn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    St. Louis, Missouri, United States
    Posts
    8,454
    Thanked: 4942
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    I'll add to the fun.

    The Naniwa Traditional 1K is also a very good choice. Feel is in between the firmer Professional and the Softer Selective. Results are simply excellent. I love my Chosera's but have been through two of these Traditional's and they are good!!

  5. #14
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    2,224
    Thanked: 481

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lynn View Post
    I'll add to the fun.

    The Naniwa Traditional 1K is also a very good choice. Feel is in between the firmer Professional and the Softer Selective. Results are simply excellent. I love my Chosera's but have been through two of these Traditional's and they are good!!
    Now that is interesting. I would not have guessed the cheapest of their 3 lines would get such a positive review.

  6. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Omaha
    Posts
    228
    Thanked: 26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lynn View Post
    I'll add to the fun.

    The Naniwa Traditional 1K is also a very good choice. Feel is in between the firmer Professional and the Softer Selective. Results are simply excellent. I love my Chosera's but have been through two of these Traditional's and they are good!!

    Lyn,
    When you say "Softer Selective," I can't find that stone. Are you referring to "Speciality" stone?
    Steve
    Omaha, NE

  7. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Omaha
    Posts
    228
    Thanked: 26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lynn View Post
    I'll add to the fun.

    The Naniwa Traditional 1K is also a very good choice. Feel is in between the firmer Professional and the Softer Selective. Results are simply excellent. I love my Chosera's but have been through two of these Traditional's and they are good!!
    And one more question for Lyn -- the Traditional appears to need soaking in water, unlike the other Naniwas mentioned, if I'm reading the Naniwa website correctly -- am I right on that?
    Steve
    Omaha, NE

  8. #17
      Lynn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    St. Louis, Missouri, United States
    Posts
    8,454
    Thanked: 4942
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    I am. Sorry for the confusion.

    Quote Originally Posted by 400E View Post
    Lyn,
    When you say "Softer Selective," I can't find that stone. Are you referring to "Speciality" stone?

  9. #18
      Lynn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    St. Louis, Missouri, United States
    Posts
    8,454
    Thanked: 4942
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    I don't soak mine. I just wet it a few times until the water quits absorbing into the stone and starts to pool on the surface.

    Quote Originally Posted by 400E View Post
    And one more question for Lyn -- the Traditional appears to need soaking in water, unlike the other Naniwas mentioned, if I'm reading the Naniwa website correctly -- am I right on that?

  10. #19
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Diamond Bar, CA
    Posts
    6,553
    Thanked: 3215

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gssixgun View Post
    One thing that needs to be noted is that most of the reviews and comparisons on here are between the older series of Naniwa Hones

    ie:

    It was Chosera vs Super Stone

    It is now Professional vs Specialty Stone and there are differences, most of them to the Specialty Stone series, making them a bit better then the older Super Stones..

    Just tossing the monkey wrench of truth into the convo

    Both work and they work well


    Another thing to keep in mind is the "Speed" which experienced honers are saying is Great that is because they are experienced honers and speed is a good thing.. Speed to a newer honer is not really a good thing in fact it is usually the exact opposite


    Just giving you perspective, the good news is that there is no "Bad" choice here, they are both excellent hones
    This is true, all my Chosera and Super Stones are the older stones. I have tried the new Super Stones/Naniwa Sharpening Stone/Specialty Stones, and they feel just a bit harder, but perform much the same.

    Here is a good link, to the whole line up and the confusing naming conventions. To add to the confusion they sell smaller stones under a different name. Clicking on the stones gives more information on each series.

    This quote is from the FAQ

    Q. What's the difference between the Naniwa Sharpening Stones and the Naniwa Specialty Sharpening Stones?
    A. The make up of the stones is the same. The difference is that the Naniwa Specialty Sharpening Stones are half the thickness of the Naniwa Sharpening Stones.


    I do need to replace my old, thin 12k Super Stone and see they now sell a full ¾ in 12k, (Naniwa Sharpening Stone series.)
    400E likes this.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Euclid440 For This Useful Post:

    400E (05-28-2016)

  12. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Omaha
    Posts
    228
    Thanked: 26

    Default

    Really great information -- thanks to all who have taken the time to respond to my honing newbie questions!

    And sorry Lynn for shorting you an "N". Always good to get people's names right!

    For what it's worth, I am now really tempted to go with the Traditional, based on Lynn's comments. Doesn't hurt that it's cheaper, though not the main reason I'd pick it.
    Lynn likes this.
    Steve
    Omaha, NE

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •