Results 11 to 20 of 50
-
07-01-2016, 08:45 PM #11
- Join Date
- Jul 2015
- Posts
- 165
Thanked: 7
-
07-01-2016, 08:47 PM #12
- Join Date
- Jul 2015
- Posts
- 165
Thanked: 7
-
07-01-2016, 09:06 PM #13
yeah I think there is a difference between what we know as "auto-slurrying" and dishing of a hone that is never lapped...
an Ark will eventually get dished out with prolonged use... would you call it a slurrying stone?
-
07-02-2016, 01:58 AM #14
-
07-02-2016, 02:10 AM #15
Ooooh! A honing discussion!
"Don't be stubborn. You are missing out."
I rest my case.
-
07-02-2016, 02:15 AM #16
- Join Date
- Sep 2013
- Location
- NW Indiana
- Posts
- 1,060
Thanked: 246For me at least, any shedding of grit would be considered auto-slurry. I would say that all natural stones do it - the variable here is the degree or rate and volume of production of auto-slurry. For those stones that would take years to dish, the degree of auto-slurry is very low - which may make it effectively zero during the honing of a single razor, but not actually zero. The finish on the honing surface also makes a huge difference to the degree/rate of auto-slurrying. Both a coarser lap with a coarser diamond plate or coarser grit of wet/dry and a lapping with a newer sharper diamond plate will result in a higher degree/rate of auto-slurry when compared to a stone lapped with a finer diamond plate or finer grit of wet/dry and/or duller, more worn in diamond plate.
As with most other things in this world, everything is relative, and goes by degrees. Those stones that barely shed any grit may give just as good a shave as those that are kept religiously wiped clean of auto-slurry or they may not - just as some stones can give a good shave even when slurried purposely. It's just a matter of getting to know your individual stone(s) and how they work best for your face.
-
07-02-2016, 03:11 AM #17
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Rochester, MN
- Posts
- 11,544
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 3795
-
07-02-2016, 04:01 AM #18
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
- Posts
- 2,943
Thanked: 433I've had about 10 coticules (unlike Utopian, who could pave a small driveway with his...lol!) pass through my possession and three of those didn't auto slurry nearly at all and would take at least 100 laps to even detect any hint of a slurry, others got milky looking after maybe ten laps. The ones I kept started to slurry a small bit after 50 laps or so. They are rocks and they are all different I would think that even the softest ones work well with the proper techniques.
-
07-02-2016, 04:10 AM #19
-
07-02-2016, 12:21 PM #20
Informative post, and indeed it should prove helpful. Getting rid of the slurry before the finish is why I rinse the stone under the tap while rubbing the surface with my palm, as well as rinsing and drying the razor's edge.
However, I do think people overestimate the number of auto-slurrying hones. I have not tried hundreds of coticules, but still quite a fair number and have only found one that slightly auto-slurries. I recall Bart Torfs, who has indeed tried hundreds of coticules, mentioning that auto-slurrying is not all that common in coticules.
To me, a sign of auto-slurrying is that when honing on plain water, steel is removed relatively fast but there is no noticeable increase in keenness (visually I find the difference to be marginal, even though to the trained eye it is detectable, just not as clearly as the lack of increased keenness). I have a small bout that does that, ergo minor autoslurrying going on there. I also have another bout that I can use to accomplish minor corrections in keenness on plain water. It is fast but still adds keenness, ergo there is no autoslurrying going on.
Interesting factoid: most (I hesitate to say 'all') Belgian Blue whetstones autoslurry. Like crazy.
-
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Pithor For This Useful Post:
Badgister (07-02-2016), s0litarys0ldier (07-03-2016)