Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 46
Like Tree21Likes

Thread: Magnification recommendations?

  1. #31
    Senior Member kelbro's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    N. Carolina
    Posts
    1,352
    Thanked: 181

    Default

    Wow. Lots of good stuff here.

    This does everything that I need with regards to edges.

    Name:  s-l400.jpg
Views: 136
Size:  22.5 KB
    Euclid440 and Benz like this.

  2. #32
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    26
    Thanked: 14

    Default

    Yes indeed, that one does all you need! I have a couple of identical ones too.... and if you need a decent lens, and make a truly powerful smartphone microscope, as shown, simply unscrew the two tiny screws on the side, and retrieve the lens......as in the current state the plastic casing does not allow for perfect and close contact to the camera of the phone. You should be able to see completely different, and much better results if you use this lens with a smartphone, as the magnification is increased by at least 8 times. By the way, these are not 40x lenses, even though they say so..... more like 10x, but still, they are good enough for us.
    Euclid440 likes this.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to fxt913 For This Useful Post:

    Euclid440 (12-23-2016)

  4. #33
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Diamond Bar, CA
    Posts
    6,553
    Thanked: 3215

    Default

    I guess magnification is much like natural Ebay, grit ratings… whatever the seller wants it to be.

    Yup, those are nice loupes, I found a few I had ordered and misplaced. They are cheap, quick and easy to use and the switch is larger than the 60X that I have, which is a pain to use for that reason.

  5. #34
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Seattle,WA.
    Posts
    579
    Thanked: 55

    Default

    I have a much simpler setup for something like the Carson. Use a mouse pad and put the base of the Carson on the edge of it. Open the razor to 90 degrees and put in around the mouse pad (close to it and not on it).

    This raises the microscope above the blade but still within focusing range. You then just slide the microscope along the edge of the mouse pad parallel to the blade.

    You can add a flashlight to change the lighting angles. You can have the blade facing away from the mouse pad rather than facing it and the lighting angle is better. You will actually see the edge rather than just seeing a bright white line.

    When you think you have a mirror finish with no scratches...just change the lighting angle.

  6. #35
    Senior Member kelbro's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    N. Carolina
    Posts
    1,352
    Thanked: 181

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fxt913 View Post
    Yes indeed, that one does all you need! I have a couple of identical ones too.... and if you need a decent lens, and make a truly powerful smartphone microscope, as shown, simply unscrew the two tiny screws on the side, and retrieve the lens......as in the current state the plastic casing does not allow for perfect and close contact to the camera of the phone. You should be able to see completely different, and much better results if you use this lens with a smartphone, as the magnification is increased by at least 8 times. By the way, these are not 40x lenses, even though they say so..... more like 10x, but still, they are good enough for us.
    Thanks. I believe that I bought three of these so I may dismantle one of them when the battery conks out.

  7. #36
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    26
    Thanked: 14

    Default

    In the first image, you see three cheapo magnifiers I happen to have. The one on the left is the same as kelbro's. As it is, it is somewhat useful for my naked eye checks. The lens can be retrieved with a bit of an effort. The one in the middle, is the Chinese knockoff of a Carson, and it is completely unusable. Waste of money! But, again, the lenses can be retrieved,and they are higher powered ones..... and this is indeed what I am going to do....my next project! Glad I did not trash it. The one on the right is the better one. It is the one I use the most, as it also uses conventional AAA batteries. Its lens too is one of the better ones, compared to others belonging to the "cheapo" category. It is quite inexpensive, $2-3...got it a couple of years ago. If anyone happens to have this one: the lens is EASILY retrievable, as all you have to do is unscrew the black plastic ring, as seen in the pictures. You can just as easily put it back together, if you choose to do so.


    Name:  1.jpg
Views: 101
Size:  21.2 KBName:  2.jpg
Views: 104
Size:  19.8 KBName:  3.jpg
Views: 104
Size:  21.4 KB
    Last edited by fxt913; 12-23-2016 at 08:32 PM.

  8. #37
    < Banned User >
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Saratoga, CA
    Posts
    597
    Thanked: 59

    Default

    Well, I just cleaned the sensor and glass lenses with alcohol and this is the best I think I can get out of my Celestron 5mp USB Microscope camera.
    EMC45 and Marshal like this.

  9. #38
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Seattle,WA.
    Posts
    579
    Thanked: 55

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aerdvaark View Post
    Well, I just cleaned the sensor and glass lenses with alcohol and this is the best I think I can get out of my Celestron 5mp USB Microscope camera.
    Good picture, bad edge. What is the magnification?

  10. #39
    < Banned User >
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Saratoga, CA
    Posts
    597
    Thanked: 59

    Default

    I have it cranked up all the way to 400X. But I doubt that is accurate.

    Edit: I don't know where I got 400X, The camera claims 200X.
    Last edited by Aerdvaark; 12-23-2016 at 10:21 PM.

  11. #40
    illegitimum non carborundum Utopian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Rochester, MN
    Posts
    11,544
    Thanked: 3795
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    That is an excellent image. I too don't think that it is near 400x, but it is a great sharp image.

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •