Results 21 to 23 of 23
Thread: Barber Hones Under A Microscope
-
07-21-2007, 05:09 PM #21
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Athens Greece
- Posts
- 240
Thanked: 10No if you make comparition of similar items!
But razor hones cut with different ways so the result is that tell you the grit size
-
07-21-2007, 06:22 PM #22
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Posts
- 882
Thanked: 108I think it's just that with sandpaper, everyone you're looking at is a cutting agent, while this isn't necessarily the case with hones.
I think heavyduty said something about a more powerful scope telling you more. This makes sense; if you know something about the stone and know what the cutting agent is – garnets in a coticule, for example – then you might be able to tell something about the fineness of those garnets at great magnification. But I think Josh's point that the best way to tell is to check the scratches on your bevel, not the stone surface, really nails it.
-
07-21-2007, 07:45 PM #23
Yea, with sandpaper its all there in front of you to see. You don't need any magnification but when your talking abrasives buried in a carrier matrix and synthetic abrasives thats all a different story. I very much doubt you could see the individual abrasives with a radio shack microscope. The resolution just isn't there. I think with a coticule type stone you would need very high magnification 300-400x even with a real quality bino scope, maybe much more. Those garnets are really microscopic. If they were big they wouldn't do much good. I have some garnet xtls about 2 inches across imagine what scratches they would make on your edge!
No matter how many men you kill you can't kill your successor-Emperor Nero