Results 1 to 5 of 5
-
03-27-2008, 04:32 PM #1
mabe a rereun but buying a hone and need to know coticule vs spyderco
I am going to buy a new hone and need to know, all opinions welcome. I am buying a new polishing stone to add to my bout. should I get a new bigger like an 8x2 coticule, a spyderco ultrafine, or something else. I know this has been talked to death but I can't find any good comparison of the two in the serches.
Don
-
03-27-2008, 04:41 PM #2
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Norway
- Posts
- 507
Thanked: 95There's this on Badger&Blade, take it for what it is, both the coticule and the UF are featured.
-
03-27-2008, 05:21 PM #3
bjorn's post pretty much sums it up.
There are other differences: the Spyderco is meant to be used without lubrication/water, and it also is a biotch to lap if it is not flat when you get it. I have had great success with it so far, however, and it was my first (and only) finishing stone.
-
03-27-2008, 07:49 PM #4
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 3,763
Thanked: 735Don't forget the Chinese 12k. For $30, it seems like a nice option as well.
In case you haven't seen this yet--
From Mr. Zowada's website:
Chinese 12k edge:
Spyderco UF edge:
Coticle edge:
Currently I'm using diamond lapping film down to 0.5um, but I'm thinking to get the Chinese 12k myself. Seems like a nice smooth edge, and it has a large surface area (8 x 2 3/4).
-
03-29-2008, 01:40 AM #5
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Rochester, MN
- Posts
- 11,552
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 3795One caveat.
The 12K is cheap but you will almost definitely have to lap it and it is not a cake walk to do. Thus you need to take that into account when making your choice. The Spyderco is typically considered to be flat enough to not require lapping.
I have both. I like them both. I cannot recommend either one over the other.