Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 26

Thread: X-Pattern, why?

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    711
    Thanked: 22

    Default

    I do not use the X pattern, because when I tried, and was watching, the heel was spending like 100th of a second on the hone, whilst the rest of the blade spent some time on the hone. I got the image of those razors you see with the toe 4/8, the center 5/8 and the heel still original 6/8. I do believe some fellow members tried to explain something about that, yet it still made no sense to me, therefore I choose to avoid it.

    I guess its like most things, when at first there seems like only 1 way to do something, it becomes the accepted standard.

  2. #12
    Senior Member kevint's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,875
    Thanked: 285

    Default

    I thought that's why hones have corners- so you can use the stone to cut where you need to cut regardless of wide or narrow. You should balance where the edge is abraded to get to or maintain the shape you want

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Wales UK
    Posts
    1,087
    Thanked: 84

    Default

    I've got a W&B and a Wards and Co exactly like this. I have been trying alternate honning to sort it out. It is working on the W&B, the heel is slowly getting in line.

  4. #14
    Member marklar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    60
    Thanked: 5

    Default hmmm

    i think im supposed to be walking away with the idea that no one way is the best way... but that a variety of methods can be employeed to get the best out of a variety of situations. I just wondered if there was a deffinate answer.. I don't have a problem with doing it, i just got to wondering what the rational was.

    this input is interesting, thanks!

  5. #15
    Senior Member kevint's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,875
    Thanked: 285

    Default

    That's why I asked Howard (wasn't it?)when he mentioned he was making a video with Hap if they were dealing with the problems that arise when honing and repairing damage rather than just another plain old vid for beginners.

  6. #16
    I hone therefore I shave moviemaniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Hobbiton, Upper Austria
    Posts
    151
    Thanked: 6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by loueedacat View Post
    No. Certainly not unless you are dwelling on the very low grit hones. If you are spending a lot of time in the coticule zone I doubt you'll do too much damage no mattter what you do.
    This is the key point here. Although, if you only have one razor and touch it up for years and years in an X-pattern you'll run into the same problems in the end

    @marklar: your post pretty much sums it up. There is no "perfect" way to hone a razor, each one is different. But you've got to think about what you're doing and that is the key!

  7. #17
    Member AFDavis11's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    5,726
    Thanked: 1486

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by marklar View Post

    this input is interesting, thanks!
    But interesting doesn't really get a razor sharp and shaving smoothly either. And then you've got those hundreds of posts on the x-pattern to consider too.

  8. #18
    The original Skolor and Gentileman. gugi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    17,410
    Thanked: 3906
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JimmyH-AD View Post
    So is the general consensus that if I hone in an X pattern exclusively that I will create a frown in my blade ?
    No, this is not the case. The hone coarseness is irrelevant - it just speeds things up.
    There are at least two variables that determine how fast the steel is removed
    (1) the time a particular point of the razors spends in contact with the hone
    (2) the pressure (yes there is always a contact pressure otherwise there will be no change to the metal)

    Interestingly enough if the blade is straight and the spine is even the edge naturally comes out straight even when you use narrower hone, as long as the whole edge gets in contact with the hone. If one section of the razor gets narrower the pressure on the other sections is slightly larger and it wears off faster so at the end it evens out.

    If your hone is long enough you can angle the razor and have the whole edge be in contact with the stone as in the following images:





    The barber's manual shows that honing at an angle to the edge is important for creating striations. This is critical if finishing on a relatively coarse stone, and less important if using extremely fine stones.

  9. #19
    BHAD cured Sticky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    1,306
    Thanked: 230

    Default

    For what it's worth, this barber text sums it up in pretty concise terms (pg. 24) and gives an easy cure for the potential problem (of smile vs. frown).

    Even on wide hones, I just get better results with an X-pattern; so that's what I always use. I think it handles smiling and slightly warped edges better maybe (or perhaps I get better results out of long familiarity).
    Last edited by Sticky; 07-27-2008 at 07:08 PM.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Sticky For This Useful Post:

    JimmyHAD (07-28-2008)

  11. #20
    The original Skolor and Gentileman. gugi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    17,410
    Thanked: 3906
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AFDavis11 View Post
    But interesting doesn't really get a razor sharp and shaving smoothly either. And then you've got those hundreds of posts on the x-pattern to consider too.
    indeed - what else can be said.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •