Results 1 to 10 of 17
-
12-10-2008, 06:05 AM #1
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Buffalo, NY
- Posts
- 61
Thanked: 1Just got my Stereo Microscope, very very useful (found problems)
I just did my first honing of a razor I bought off ebay, and it gave a very good shave. However, when I looked at the edge under 30x Magnification I saw about 1/2 dozen little micro nicks and one decent one.
Now I looked at it again with my eyes (20/20) and I could only barely see the 1, the rest I couldn't.
So, back to the hones. Put it on the 1k Norton until all the micro nicks were gone at 40x magnification. The did the progression to make it shave ready again (Norton 4k/8k Chinese 12k Strop)
Shaved even better!
The razor now looks just as good under a microscope as a brand new Mach3 or Fusion does at 40x magnification.
-
12-10-2008, 06:53 AM #2
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Rochester, MN
- Posts
- 11,544
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 3795Welcome to the club of the magnified and enlightened! I consider mine to be an invaluable tool for every single razor that I hone. Nothing beats a stereomicroscope for ease of use. The depth of field allows you to focus simply by moving the razor rather than twiddling knobs so you get a better view faster.
Good buy!
-
12-10-2008, 09:12 AM #3
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Adelaide Australia
- Posts
- 72
Thanked: 6I'd love to get my hands on something to be able to see what's going on,
I'm wondering if anyone has used one of these before ?
Something more in my price range, but if it wouldn't do the job then i wont waste my money
-
12-10-2008, 11:17 AM #4
-
12-10-2008, 02:40 PM #5
Way to go. Without magnification, at least a good eye loupe, a honer is in the dark. No pun intended. People would be amazed at what they can get a "good" shave out of if they could see it magnified. Having magnification really makes a lot of difference in getting that edge right and a truly smooth shave.
Be careful how you treat people on your way up, you may meet them again on your way back down.
-
12-10-2008, 03:22 PM #6
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Rochester, MN
- Posts
- 11,544
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 3795If the magnification range is 60-100x, I'm not sure that's ideal because the magnification is too high. Personally, I think you see most of what you want to see at 20-40x because you can see larger areas of the blade with sufficient magnification. Then again, I've never used this scope and Ken has.
-
12-10-2008, 03:44 PM #7
I've got an old stereo scope second or third hand with 30x, a 30x and a 20x eye loupe and they serve the purpose well. I would like to get one of the better scopes with the 100x capability that you can take photos of your edges with. Maybe if the economy comes back around I will. Meanwhile the 30x is real good.
Be careful how you treat people on your way up, you may meet them again on your way back down.
-
12-10-2008, 03:47 PM #8
I use one of the 60/100x scopes. The Radio Shack variety: it works dang good, but you do have to "learn" it's quirks and idiosyncracies for sure.
How much was the microscope, mademporer? I soooooo want a stereo scope.
-
12-10-2008, 05:41 PM #9
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Buffalo, NY
- Posts
- 61
Thanked: 1
-
12-10-2008, 05:52 PM #10