Results 11 to 14 of 14
-
01-01-2009, 04:25 AM #11
Since I've started honing my razors several years back I've bought the wide stones for the steadiness factor. Over the time I've gone to the two inch stones and found I like the feel much better.
I'm now considering purchasing the 1"x6 Coticule on Howard's site. The reason I'm considering this is it is about a third of the width of a straight blade. Using such a narrow stone would provide the most even wear along the length of the blade in beginning, middle and end of the stroke while using the x pattern.
My personal belief is that the narrow dimension of many vintage stones is perhaps for this reason. No I don't have anything factual to back up my supposition.
It seems that most of us eventually get several of different sizes as this is a fun and ever desiring more gear kind of hobby.
MikeB
-
The Following User Says Thank You to sdsquarepoint For This Useful Post:
ShaveWares (04-17-2015)
-
01-01-2009, 04:39 AM #12
I would also agree that it's all about personal preference. I think something around 1.5 inches wide might be the most versitile, since they are decently wide but should still be effective for warped/smiley blades.
-
01-01-2009, 12:11 PM #13
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Germany
- Posts
- 24
Thanked: 4
-
01-01-2009, 06:58 PM #14
I currently have a 1 1/4" x 6" coticule, and I like it very much. But, with the narrower stones, as it was mentioned above, are a little harder to keep the razor flat on while honing. I say if you can keep a razor flat on a narrower hone (i.e. 1"-2") go for that, but if you have difficulty with keeping it flat go for the wider.
I think the reason more experienced honers, i.e. Lynn, prefer the 3" wide ones is because they have advance techniques that they can use to account for warped blades even on a wide stone.
I recently ordered a 8"x2" from Howard. That seems to be the nice compromise for me between a wide and narrow hone.
Dave