Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15
Like Tree2Likes

Thread: Downstroking to remove microchips

  1. #11
    . Bill S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Richfield, Ohio
    Posts
    2,521
    Thanked: 597

    Default

    [quote=I'm no doubt preaching to the choir since we all have the same straight razor "illness" if you know what I mean.
    Don[/quote]

    Yeah...I think I know what you mean.

  2. #12
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    19
    Thanked: 2

    Default

    I went back and observed the same blade under 100X (the lowest magnification on this scope), and counted a total of five microchips across the expanse of the edge. None of them were wide or deep. These look like craters on 450X, not to mention the number of observable microchips increases by 6 fold. I've got a feeling the microchips that I'm seeing would be unresovable at 30 to 40X even with the best optics.

  3. #13
    Coticule researcher
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    1,872
    Thanked: 1212

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dicharry View Post
    I went back and observed the same blade under 100X (the lowest magnification on this scope), and counted a total of five microchips across the expanse of the edge. None of them were wide or deep. These look like craters on 450X, not to mention the number of observable microchips increases by 6 fold. I've got a feeling the microchips that I'm seeing would be unresolvable at 30 to 40X even with the best optics.
    Lucky me...

  4. #14
    Senior Member JCitron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Tallahassee, FL
    Posts
    358
    Thanked: 43

    Default

    Though I have a scope I rarely use it when honing. I figure there was a time when barbers honed blades to perfection without them and so can I.

    If I cant feel the chips on the TNT then they shouldn't be an issue. Now if I get to the shaving stage and it won't perform and I don't know why, then I may check for micro-chipping.

    At a high enough magnification nothing is without a level of roughness.

  5. #15
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    19
    Thanked: 2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill S View Post
    I don't typically use more than 100X, but I have noticed the same thing. Despite the microchips the razors shave extremely well. In fact, when I have decided to do nothing about the microchips (usual course of action) they seem to smooth out with ongoing stropping. All in all I find microchipping to be a pretty interesting topic, but I don't know how much they really affect the performance of an otherwise keen blade.
    Bill S,
    You are correct sir! Those microchips did smooth out with ongoing stropping. Smoothed out to the point that they are very few and far between and hardly noticeably, even on 450X magnification.

    Verhoeven reach the conclusion that stropping on a non-abrasive loaded strop will not benefit the edge. See page 24 conclusion #3
    Experiments on Knife Sharpening - John Verhoeven

    I know from personal observation that stropping does smooth out the microchips. Of course his work was with knife blades, but a blade is a blade albeit the angles may differ.
    Last edited by dicharry; 04-22-2009 at 02:02 PM. Reason: correction

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to dicharry For This Useful Post:

    Rajagra (04-22-2009)

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •