Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: Norton vs. King

  1. #11
    Hones/Honing/Master Barber avatar1999's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Waynesboro, PA
    Posts
    997
    Thanked: 199
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TTfireman View Post
    Thanks guys. That's what i was wanting to know. I lapped it and it came out pretty dang smooth. It is a huge difference. Then I dropped my flattening stone. but I guess if you gotta drop one, drop the cheap one. So now I guess I'll get a dmt for lapping. What's the recommended grit?
    Pick up the DMT D8C. Will serve ALL your lapping needs! As was told to me, make sure you lap under running water, so you don't risk losing the diamond coating

    *EDIT* DOH! Beat me to it Jimmy....

    *EDIT 2* Same price as on SRD, but FREE shipping on Amazon HERE
    Last edited by avatar1999; 10-07-2009 at 03:59 AM.

  2. #12
    The Great & Powerful Oz onimaru55's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Bodalla, NSW
    Posts
    15,623
    Thanked: 3749

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hardheart View Post
    Norton also does not match JIS with their grit ratings. The 4/8K would be 2.5/4K according to micron size of abrasive particles.
    Particle size alone does not determine grit rating. Binders & friability all enter into it. Cigarette smoke is 2 micron but won't cut it as an 8k hone
    The white gleam of swords, not the black ink of books, clears doubts and uncertainties and bleak outlooks.

  3. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    76
    Thanked: 7

    Default

    of course not, at 2 micron it would be 6K

    I use average micron grading instead of grit, because of things like Norton's numbers that don't correlate to particle size in any other system for their 4 & 8K.

  4. #14
    Cheapskate Honer Wildtim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    A2 Michigan
    Posts
    2,371
    Thanked: 241

    Default

    The feel of a hone is determined more by the matrix and less by the cutting particles. For example I can't tell the difference between my 1 and 5 micron lapping films, but they sure cut differently.

  5. #15
    The Great & Powerful Oz onimaru55's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Bodalla, NSW
    Posts
    15,623
    Thanked: 3749

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hardheart View Post
    of course not, at 2 micron it would be 6K

    I use average micron grading instead of grit, because of things like Norton's numbers that don't correlate to particle size in any other system for their 4 & 8K.
    Sooo.. An 8K GS Shapton at just under 2 micron is really a 6k
    The white gleam of swords, not the black ink of books, clears doubts and uncertainties and bleak outlooks.

  6. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    76
    Thanked: 7

    Default

    according to electrical resistance JIS it would be. By FEPA - F1500. CAMI - something like 1750. Again, this is why I look more at micron rating, not grit.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •