Results 21 to 22 of 22
-
05-24-2006, 10:13 PM #21Originally Posted by cudahogs
In fact, I used to go to an old time master barber who used to do just that. Even with the high volume of use in his shop he sent razors no more often than once a month. He had quite a collection, so I don't know how often he would send out a particular razor.
-
05-25-2006, 04:18 AM #22
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
- Posts
- 8,023
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 2209Some time back I did go to the website for a Col Conk hone and it said 1200 grit. We all agree that the grit rating is not the be all/end all. If some guys rate the Col Conk hone at approx 6000 and base this on actual use then that is a much better yardstick. The info on the grit rating for the black and translucent arkansas stone was also taken from various websites. I kow that the actual rating system they use is very different, I think it is based on specific density but I may be wrong.
There may very well be some black arkansas that are 1200 grit or 6000 grit or even finer but that will vary with each stone. A person can only try what they have and judge the results for themselves.
I have 6 different Belgian coticules and when I examine them under a micrscope both the size of the garnets and their density are different on each hone. So it would not be surprising to find that other natural stones also vary in their characteristics.
That points out the advantage of the current manmade stones from compaanies like Norton. We have a much better idea of what we are getting for our dollars.
Originally Posted by Joe LerchRandolph Tuttle, a SRP Mentor for residents of Minnesota & western Wisconsin