View Poll Results: What's in your pocket today?
- Voters
- 665. You may not vote on this poll
-
A multi-tool (Leatherman, etc.)
61 9.17% -
A traditional multiblade (Swiss Army, etc.)
87 13.08% -
A traditional single blade (Buck, etc.)
157 23.61% -
A tactical folder or fixed blade (Strider, etc.)
235 35.34% -
More than one of the above.
125 18.80%
Results 1 to 10 of 1183
Threaded View
-
09-10-2013, 06:31 AM #10
Well, no. At least not in that manner. My setup grows over time, but generally only with things that I need, or at least add something. For example, I have a good anvil. I don't need or want a second one. I have 1 grinder. I don't need a second one. If I ever get to a situation where I make lots of knives and I need to switch attachments often, I might add a second one to fulfill a different function. I have several hammers, but each for a different purpose.
Or take Glen's workshop as an example. He has 6 buffers next to each others, each wheel loaded with a different compound, because he needs to switch so often it becomes a bloody nuisance. But that's the key: multiples of one thing only make sense if they fulfill different functions.Til shade is gone, til water is gone, Into the shadow with teeth bared, screaming defiance with the last breath.
To spit in Sightblinder’s eye on the Last Day