Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 29
Like Tree37Likes

Thread: A bit more about optics

  1. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    iceland
    Posts
    92
    Thanked: 38

    Default

    About chinese triplets
    Chinese loupe named "triplet"(left) and normal triplet(right)


    So it's not a 30x or 20x - it's about 10x.
    and it's not a triplet in real - just a monocle system.
    + there is no CA correction like normal triplets have
    + no distortion correction
    Last edited by Botanic; 09-08-2018 at 11:14 AM.
    earcutter and BobH like this.

  2. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    iceland
    Posts
    92
    Thanked: 38

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RayClem View Post
    ....
    MAD: Magnifier Acquisition Disorder.

    and i think MAD is the best name for this, because prices aren't good
    (see Swiss Axe Triplet Hawk link -- i wish to unseen this pokemon -- better to collect eschers).
    ...
    Wait a minute..SAD? Sounds like a new hobby
    mad sad had in all its manifestations
    Last edited by Botanic; 09-08-2018 at 11:44 AM.
    earcutter and BobH like this.

  3. #13
    lobeless earcutter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    4,864
    Thanked: 762

    Default

    I love seeing magnified pictures of a straight razors edge as it get honed progressively on finer and finer grit stones. What’s the best magnifying system for that?
    David

  4. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    iceland
    Posts
    92
    Thanked: 38

    Default

    Honestly - I don't have enought information on this theme.
    Not rich enought to make another journey
    ----------

    I know that DinoLite is nice (AM413T -- see video and pic review)
    but it's about 300-400USD or more(link)
    - i'm too greedy. That's what I think about to buy to myself sometimes..But I need to sell all(or at least first hundred of them) my stones first

    Hozan could be good - http://www.hozan.co.jp/E/catalog/Optical/index.html

    Or Nikon SMZ, Olympus VM - not enought information, but they are expensive.
    Pavol Šandor(youtube) uses Nikon SMZ:
    Microscope SMZ-168 Trinocular + reduction + NIKON D7000


    And that inexpensive chinese and near digital microscopes not good for my eyes - it's like I'm in the childhood with quake 1.
    The only one inexpensive and not so bad that i know: Supereyes B008
    ()


    And there is a variant with chinese C-mount USB camera
    how it looks like https://yadi.sk/d/zsLnpfEoyHFqH
    Matrix size is 1/2.5, 5MP.
    primers
    https://yadi.sk/d/xEYbi6_doQkxw
    https://yadi.sk/d/a_d_u6Trpz2kW
    https://yadi.sk/d/2t1BcpnIpi3W4
    it's about 200 USD

    Or this one

    it's C-mount camera too, but don't know exactly wich is.
    Just know that it's something like Digital HD 16MP 1080P HDMI USB 300X Industrial Electronic Video Microscope Camera Set
    earcutter likes this.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Botanic For This Useful Post:

    earcutter (09-08-2018)

  6. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    iceland
    Posts
    92
    Thanked: 38

    Default

    So I use this

    and don't want to think about new type of HAD (Photographic..PAD? mh..not original any more)
    Olympus E-3 + Zuiko 70-300 + reverse ring adapter + Zuiko 50mm.
    How it works
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macro_photography


    Focusing -- is a headache - all manual.

    Result is good
    Hindostan


    Omura


    Opinel Stainless + typic LI


    Victorinox + Suehiro G-8
    Last edited by Botanic; 09-08-2018 at 03:58 PM.
    earcutter likes this.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Botanic For This Useful Post:

    earcutter (09-08-2018)

  8. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    iceland
    Posts
    92
    Thanked: 38

    Default

    My old set: Olympus C-7070 + Peak 2008-50
    like this:
    (src: http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/marimari0530/28208744.html)


    Result:


    And here https://straightrazorpalace.com/hone...ml#post1484034
    you can see more (photos with scale)
    earcutter likes this.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Botanic For This Useful Post:

    earcutter (09-08-2018)

  10. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    iceland
    Posts
    92
    Thanked: 38

    Default

    My friend use Samsung NX + various lenses
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/oldtor/
    And that is another level




    =========
    Main theme about this How to make a photo (RUS)
    but I still have not done with sorting and compiling -- it will not be soon.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Botanic For This Useful Post:

    earcutter (09-08-2018)

  12. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    iceland
    Posts
    92
    Thanked: 38

    Default

    If you want something inexpensive:
    chinese USB isn't good variant, imho.






    Kenko Do-Nature STV40M - 20x
    CNat Pandod JY ~2000-3000JIS


    Kenko Do-Nature STV120M - 60x
    the same
    earcutter likes this.

  13. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    iceland
    Posts
    92
    Thanked: 38

    Default

    Or cheap chinese mini-microscope:







    1 div=0.5mm.


    ===========
    Smartphone variant:

    earcutter likes this.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Botanic For This Useful Post:

    earcutter (09-08-2018)

  15. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    iceland
    Posts
    92
    Thanked: 38

    Default

    Loupe or microscope


    Loupe is better when you are sharpening something not sraight. Like razor with smiling line of the edge.
    So microscope isn't easy to use in this case, because you need to spend time to:
    - focuse on the edge
    - depth of field is small - you spend time to refocus from one area to another, from edge to bevel
    - you need more light
    - the angle range of lightning, that give you informative image is also more narrow

    But it's not common for every loupe.
    Good loupe with 10x power is nice.
    15x - is darker but still good (Peak 2023 15x, Peak 1985 Steinheil 14x).
    20x - is too dark and hard to focuse.
    Even Peak 1964 22x, that isn't cheap, isn't better than acrlylic microscope Kenko STV40M (20-40x). Actually, Kenko is even more usable.

    So for rouge honing, repairing etc - sharpening stages below 1000grit - 10x loupe is more comfortable and faster.
    But if we are talknig about small details(~20mkm. and less), sharpening at 3000 grit stage and thinner, some research purpose - microscope 40-60x helps a lot ("must have").

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •