Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18
  1. #11
    Senior Member Joe Lerch's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    1,331
    Thanked: 8

    Default

    My observation is that using oil when the whiskers are long is counterproductive. It makes the whiskers slippery and hard to cut. On the other hand, after you shave down to a fine stubble there's nothing left to get slippery, and the oil provides great protection for the skin. So, I apply oil for the last pass.

  2. #12
    The Hurdy Gurdy Man thebigspendur's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    33,005
    Thanked: 5019
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    I've tried the oil and found it made no difference so I don't use the stuff. Besides ,supposedly the oil isn't good for badger shave brushes.
    No matter how many men you kill you can't kill your successor-Emperor Nero

  3. #13
    Member russellnyc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    84
    Thanked: 12

    Default

    I find that I get a closer shave without oil, perhaps because the blade catches on the hair better and cuts it off. However, I have found that I get a more comfortable shave with oil, perhaps because it provides the lubricant layer that advertisers claim it has...

  4. #14
    Senior Member blabbermouth JLStorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Rocky Mountains, CO
    Posts
    2,934
    Thanked: 16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thebigspendur
    I've tried the oil and found it made no difference so I don't use the stuff. Besides ,supposedly the oil isn't good for badger shave brushes.
    I have heard that as well....

  5. #15
    Loudmouth FiReSTaRT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Etobicoke, ON
    Posts
    7,171
    Thanked: 64

    Default

    Just because it's out there doesn't mean it's useful.. Just think of Fusion battery-powered lol

  6. #16
    Senior Member Joe Lerch's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    1,331
    Thanked: 8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FiReSTaRT
    Just because it's out there doesn't mean it's useful.. Just think of Fusion battery-powered lol
    In my opinion that's a bad example. Gillette finally delivered with this one. It lets an oblivious shaver get a really nice shave, if he's willing to pay through the nose.

  7. #17
    Loudmouth FiReSTaRT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Etobicoke, ON
    Posts
    7,171
    Thanked: 64

    Default

    That's why I was talking about the battery-powered model which is a zero improvement over the regular model. A waste of money and batteries.

  8. #18
    Senior Member Joe Lerch's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    1,331
    Thanked: 8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FiReSTaRT
    That's why I was talking about the battery-powered model which is a zero improvement over the regular model. A waste of money and batteries.
    That's where I disagree. When I tested the Fusion I found that the motorized version was much smoother than the regular one. In other words, the motor did a lot for the performance. If I turned off the motor the shave immediately became harsher.

    The same was true of the motorized M3. Gillette did something to tune the vibration delicately to the razor, because any other vibrating razor I have ever tried just felt rough. I'm not a Gillette fan (quite the opposite), but I give them credit when they deserve it.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •