Page 11 of 17 FirstFirst ... 789101112131415 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 170
Like Tree317Likes

Thread: "Dip-at-toe" stubtails 18th century

  1. #101
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    17,252
    Thanked: 3222

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tjh View Post
    dip how? So like, where the width of the blade is smaller at about 80% of the way to toe than it would normally be?

    If that's it then : OOOH i see it now, ok. Why though? i initially thought it was an imperfection or something.

    No, it is just a break with the line the spine is taking. No idea why they did this but it did no last long time wise. Just one of the steps in the evolution to what a modern straight razor normally looks like.

    Bob
    Geezer and MikeT like this.
    Life is a terminal illness in the end

  2. #102
    Senior Member Fikira's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    476
    Thanked: 211

    Default

    Tze "Dip-at-toe"

    Name:  Dip-at-toe 1a.jpg
Views: 471
Size:  23.5 KB

    Who started the practice and why is unknown, but it can be used for determine the age of the razor

    https://historyrazors.wordpress.com/...8th-century-2/

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Fikira For This Useful Post:

    32t (01-20-2019)

  4. #103
    Captain ARAD. Voidmonster's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Pacifica, CA
    Posts
    2,474
    Thanked: 2226

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fikira View Post
    Tze "Dip-at-toe"

    Name:  Dip-at-toe 1a.jpg
Views: 471
Size:  23.5 KB

    Who started the practice and why is unknown, but it can be used for determine the age of the razor

    https://historyrazors.wordpress.com/...8th-century-2/
    Agreed on all points. It is a really good indicator that it was made before 1770-1780. If the razor has that blade feature, and has a maker's stamp on the top of the tang, it was definitely before 1780, and is probably closer to 1750.
    Fikira, MikeT and Tjh like this.
    -Zak Jarvis. Writer. Artist. Bon vivant.

  5. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Voidmonster For This Useful Post:

    BobH (01-21-2019), Fikira (01-21-2019), Geezer (01-21-2019), MikeT (01-21-2019)

  6. #104
    Tjh
    Tjh is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    216
    Thanked: 15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fikira View Post
    Tze "Dip-at-toe"

    Name:  Dip-at-toe 1a.jpg
Views: 471
Size:  23.5 KB

    Who started the practice and why is unknown, but it can be used for determine the age of the razor

    https://historyrazors.wordpress.com/...8th-century-2/
    ooh yea that's what i thought, the descriptions I saw in places just confused me...so if you meausure the distance between spine and edge (which is usually what people talk about when they say '7/8' or '11/16' etc, right?) that number will get a bit smaller at some point right? (or smaller than expected for a smile).

  7. #105
    Senior Member Fikira's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    476
    Thanked: 211

    Default

    Yes, but these razors are generally, if not always, smaller in width towards the tang,
    so, a 7/8' razors from 1780 is just 7/8' at its widest area, that's all
    Geezer likes this.

  8. #106
    Please dont mind my bad english, iŽ Rockabillyhelge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Moers, Germany
    Posts
    1,049
    Thanked: 127

    Default

    Is my Brammal a dip-at-toe? It seems as it has a very very light dip at the second pic:

    Name:  16317845vn.jpg
Views: 412
Size:  31.0 KB

    Name:  16317846vh.jpg
Views: 395
Size:  11.8 KB
    Geezer, sharptonn, 32t and 2 others like this.

  9. #107
    Senior Member Fikira's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    476
    Thanked: 211

    Default

    Yep, absolutely!

  10. #108
    Tjh
    Tjh is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    216
    Thanked: 15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jfk742 View Post
    Fox & Norris, huh? I don’t think I would have ever figured that on my own. Been going in circles for the last 2 hours and hadn’t gotten anywhere.

    Thank you ,SG.

    SO... guess what I finally have in my hands? . Based on the information I read here, and on geneology site(s) across the interwebs and other places, here's a little (possibly slightly fictional) story I made for this razor:

    Stephen Fox, a Cutler in Westbar Sheffield had 3 sons - John, Stephen and William who all went on to follow in their fathers footsteps. He also had daughters amongst whom was Catherine Fox, who (by 1739) had married Matthew Norris, son of another famous cutlers family in sheffield at the time. By 1748 the mark "*P" was registered to "Fox & Norris" - presumably John Fox and Matthew Norris.

    John Fox (the oldest) continued to make razors on his own, and under the "Fox & Norris" '*P' brand. By 1777 Son of Catherine and Matthew - Sam Norris was made master cutler, running his own business (eventually "Sam Norris and Sons"). The mark of "*P", however continued to be used by the ever popular "Fox & norris" company until, sometime in the 1790s the last of the brothers - John Fox had died (Matthew Norris and Catherine Fox both having died a few decades prior). Finally dissolving the "Fox and Norris" company and bequeathing the "*P" makers mark to Sam Norris, sometime in the final years of the 18th century. Sam eventually went bankrupt in 1809 and died a few years later.

    Sometime between the start of the "*P" mark in 1740s and the death of the last Fox brother in 1790's this razor was made. Likely some years later, when tensions with United States was starting to peak in the early years of 19th century then owner bought a razor strop box for two razors made by parisian cutler "Crenet Fils". Did he buy another razor for it? did he already own one? Or did the razor itself come in a set with two razors made by the now late fox&norris company as the 19th century began...we'll never know. Nor will we ever know what happened to the other razor.

    YEARS later, the box along with at least one of the razors found its way to Northern California - perhaps even brought there shortly after the war of 1812 and the tensions between US and UK died down? It eventually found its way to the back of an antique store in a small town somewhere near the bay area...where it was picked up in 2018 - well over 200 years after it was first made. It was then restored by hand, the scales (now bug bitten) re-filled and recolored and shipped to Canada...where it will stay with me for centuries more.

    I DID find a twin for this - made by Sam Norris, marked "Sam Norris" so potentially made between 1777 and 1797 (when he would have certainly inherited the "*P" mark and used it?)...so hopefully this razor will not have to miss it's twin for much longer, after almost decades and even a century or two, they will be reunited
    Yes, I know - I'm terrible at story telling .

    P.S:
    BTW i found some geneology info about Stephen Fox and his family: Stirnet And if you can take a screenshot before the site kicks you out for not logging in - it seems catherine died around 1746? wow that seems REALLY early.
    Last edited by Tjh; 02-08-2019 at 06:29 PM.
    Fikira, BobH and outback like this.

  11. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Tjh For This Useful Post:

    BobH (02-09-2019), outback (02-08-2019)

  12. #109
    Senior Member blabbermouth outback's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Akron, Ohio
    Posts
    12,010
    Thanked: 4308

    Default

    Nice write up, Bro. The story was great.! It could go into greater depth, but was just right.

    I'll add a few pics for you.

    Name:  KIMG3914.jpg
Views: 348
Size:  47.8 KB

    Name:  KIMG3930.jpg
Views: 357
Size:  36.1 KB

    Name:  KIMG3992.jpg
Views: 348
Size:  30.1 KB

    Name:  machine-gun.gif
Views: 309
Size:  20.4 KB
    Geezer, BobH, engine46 and 1 others like this.
    Mike

  13. #110
    Tjh
    Tjh is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    216
    Thanked: 15

    Default

    Alright folks, here's another one (is this one "dip at toe" as well?)... initial assessment from Glen says it's in great shape -

    Name:  s-l1600 (3).jpg
Views: 313
Size:  18.4 KB
    Name:  s-l1600 (5).jpg
Views: 295
Size:  24.4 KB
    Name:  s-l1600 (1).jpg
Views: 337
Size:  32.0 KB

    As an S:Norris, I'd initially thought this to be 1770-1790 or so, and i'm not sure if this is just the lighting or some regrinding done at some point or what, but there's more of a "shoulder" than I've seen on blades with this shape and from 1700s (not actually a shoulder, but idk what to call it: there's a more pronounced distinction between blade and tang on the plane).

    Also: what's the steel marking? I can make out maybe "****AN STEEL" ?

    Possible answer from https://acierfondu.wordpress.com/mak.../early-razors/ - "GERMAN STEEL" (razors shown there marked from the 1700's made in sheffield).

    More abt "German Steel" here http://www.sheffieldindexers.com/Mem...20Industry.pdf

    During the second half of the sixteenth century — the first account of the process
    came from Prague in 1574 — someone in Central Europe invented the cementation
    process whereby bars of wrought iron were converted to what was commonly known
    as ‘blister steel’ because of the various-sized blisters that were raised on the surface.10
    It was also known in England as ‘Cullen steel’ because it came via Cologne or as
    ‘German steel’, but that became a generic name that was applied to cementation steel
    made in England during the later seventeenth century. We do not know whether the
    ‘German steel’ that was sold to Hallamshire scissorsmiths by the Cutlers’ Company in
    1681 or the ‘parcel of German Steel’ recorded in the inventory of a Sheffield cutler in
    1702 actually came from Germany or from English sources.
    Last edited by Tjh; 02-09-2019 at 11:23 AM.
    Geezer, Fikira, BobH and 4 others like this.

  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Tjh For This Useful Post:

    BobH (02-09-2019), outback (02-09-2019)

Page 11 of 17 FirstFirst ... 789101112131415 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •