Results 11 to 20 of 37
Thread: Frameback nomenclature
-
04-14-2015, 01:28 PM #11
-
04-14-2015, 01:36 PM #12
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Location
- Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
- Posts
- 17,294
Thanked: 3224You might be right, I don't know. Here is a good post by Neil Miller explaining how a rattler is ground and why it was called that http://straightrazorpalace.com/razor...n-rattler.html .
BobLife is a terminal illness in the end
-
-
04-14-2015, 01:37 PM #13
-
04-14-2015, 01:44 PM #14
- Join Date
- Nov 2013
- Location
- Saint Marcellin, France
- Posts
- 420
Thanked: 154We do have, in French, another word for the faux frameback, which is "baguette". But it's not a common word, we more usually use "faux frameback"
Beautiful is important, but when all is said and done, you will always be faithful to a good shaver while a bad one may detter you from ever trying again. Judge with your skin, not your eyes.
-
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Aggelos For This Useful Post:
BobH (04-14-2015), criswilson10 (04-14-2015)
-
04-14-2015, 01:53 PM #15
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Location
- Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
- Posts
- 17,294
Thanked: 3224
-
04-14-2015, 01:55 PM #16
Last edited by sharptonn; 04-14-2015 at 01:59 PM.
"Don't be stubborn. You are missing out."
I rest my case.
-
04-14-2015, 02:11 PM #17
- Join Date
- Nov 2013
- Location
- Saint Marcellin, France
- Posts
- 420
Thanked: 154@BobH had to be done, I knew it beforehand
There are indeed several sub species.
The first patent for a changeable blade razor is circa 1815 if my memory serves well, by Charles (France, high luxury brand)
Now, the UK was wayyyyyyyyyyy more advanced in cutlery at that time, I would not be surprised that we may find bold grinds before that.
Other than changeable blade razors, there are razors which are quite the same in structure, without the ability to change the blade.
The consensus where I usually roam is calling both "frameback".
Everything else looking similar would be a "faux frameback", in this same consensual context.
Yet, a concave would not be considered "faux frameback", the idea being that the "baguette" (is it the same this as "rattler" ?) can be confused with a frameback at first glance and from a meter away
@Sharptonn Tomato, tomato, if it looks like a frameback but is not, you can use the technical term, or a more casual one (like I said for example, faux frameback are seldom called "baguette" in French even if the word exists)Beautiful is important, but when all is said and done, you will always be faithful to a good shaver while a bad one may detter you from ever trying again. Judge with your skin, not your eyes.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Aggelos For This Useful Post:
BobH (04-14-2015)
-
04-14-2015, 02:14 PM #18
- Join Date
- Nov 2013
- Location
- Saint Marcellin, France
- Posts
- 420
Thanked: 154Confirmed via Renzo Jardella's book & collection : circa 1800 Wade & Butcher fine indian steel, typically "baguette" grind.
Thanks to BobH's very instructive link, I think we all say the same thing and here it goes, and I try to answer BobH's question : "who was first"
- Circa 1800, the rattler, also called less technically the faux frameback, exists
- Circa 1815, there is a patent for the first frameback with a removable blade, frameback because made of two pieces of steel
- Circa 1825, we have technical testimony of the different types of grinds known at that time
* Rattler <-> Faux frameback
* Half Rattler <-> Concave
* a thin blade inserted in a support <-> frameback
The British were the first there, and clearly the frameback has been around long before someone thought of a removable blade mechanism. So, my guess would be : they were born at the same time, during the economical boom at Sheffield.Last edited by Aggelos; 04-14-2015 at 02:56 PM.
Beautiful is important, but when all is said and done, you will always be faithful to a good shaver while a bad one may detter you from ever trying again. Judge with your skin, not your eyes.
-
-
04-14-2015, 02:55 PM #19
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Location
- Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
- Posts
- 17,294
Thanked: 3224Kees has brought up a very interesting question which in turn has brought up some very interesting information, thank you to Aggelos.
My basic take away from all this is that any razor with a flat ground blade and tang that has a separate false spine attached to it or a razor with the spine integral with the tang and accepting inter changeable flat ground blades are commonly referred to as framebacks. Commonly no distinction is made between the two variants. Any razor that looks similar to the framebacks but is of one piece construction are commonly called faux framebacks with a possible sub category of the rattlers. I think my head hurts now.
BobLife is a terminal illness in the end
-
The Following User Says Thank You to BobH For This Useful Post:
Aggelos (04-14-2015)
-
04-14-2015, 02:58 PM #20
- Join Date
- Nov 2013
- Location
- Saint Marcellin, France
- Posts
- 420
Thanked: 154Then look up, I've summed it all
Beautiful is important, but when all is said and done, you will always be faithful to a good shaver while a bad one may detter you from ever trying again. Judge with your skin, not your eyes.