Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
Like Tree28Likes

Thread: Special razor 18th century George Smith

  1. #1
    Senior Member Fikira's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    476
    Thanked: 211

    Default Special razor 18th century George Smith

    Hi,
    I have acquired a very special 18th century razor I think!

    Name:  DSCN3773.jpg
Views: 1800
Size:  31.0 KBName:  DSCN3774.jpg
Views: 1317
Size:  28.3 KBName:  DSCN3785.jpg
Views: 718
Size:  30.8 KBName:  DSCN3800.jpg
Views: 772
Size:  27.6 KBName:  DSCN3822.jpg
Views: 700
Size:  16.2 KB

    This is how I got it:
    Name:  DSCN3642.jpg
Views: 807
Size:  41.6 KBName:  DSCN3644.jpg
Views: 755
Size:  44.8 KB

    The razor is made by the same maker that made this razor:
    Name:  DSCN1475.jpg
Views: 910
Size:  30.8 KBName:  DSCN1482.jpg
Views: 668
Size:  18.1 KBName:  DSCN2852.jpg
Views: 740
Size:  36.7 KB

    http://straightrazorpalace.com/razor...th-george.html

    The mark "SMITH" and the stamps on the spine" GEO. SMITH MAKER" are clearly the same! It is interesting to see that the "SMITH" mark of the first razor is a little bit bend and that the "+" above "SMITH" is merely a hint.

    Name:  DSCN3795.jpg
Views: 735
Size:  30.4 KB

    When comparing both razors and their stamps, I can only presume that they've
    used separate stamps for the "+", "SMITH", "GEO." and "MAKER"

    These 2 razors are both made by George Smith (F1734, Master Cutler 1749, presumably died 1785),
    father of Thomas Smith (F1763, who acquired the mark "+ SMITH" from his father ( after his death)
    and used it further along (Gales & Martin Directory Sheffield 1787,...))

    MOST PROBABLY, Thomas Smith had and used "T S " as his own mark (F1763)
    (Sketchley's Directory of Sheffield 1774) before he inherited the "+ SMITH" mark

    Between 1770 - 1785, George Smith operated as George Smith & sons, Peacroft

    Together with the fact that the shape of these razor, and the typical shape of the tang,
    they're clearly older then 1775, it could very well be that these 2 razors are made BEFORE 1770
    (George Smith alone, without his son's)!

    They also have a typical "Dip-at-toe"
    ( http://straightrazorpalace.com/razor...h-century.html ),
    seen in razors of the Revolutionary time, 1760 - 1790,
    so these razors could very well be from 1760 - 1770

    The special thing on the first razor is the special shape!
    Besides the "Dip-at-toe" , it has a distinct transition between edge and tang,
    something that is thought to be done from the early 1800's, not before 1770.
    Also, the tang has a non-typical shape, it becomes very narrow towards the beginning of the edge!

    The razor still has got its original scales and iron collars, so it isn't a "fixed" or restored blade, it is genuine and original IMHO!
    Also observe the very minor honing of this wedge ground razor, and , while I didn't hone it at all, its edge is still sharp!

    To conclude, it is also interesting to see bigger pivot collars (about 3/8" or 9,5mm) against the collars at the "wedge" side (5/16" or 8mm)
    Last edited by Fikira; 07-05-2015 at 02:26 PM.

  2. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Fikira For This Useful Post:

    ajkenne (02-27-2016), engine46 (07-06-2015), Euclid440 (07-05-2015), Firefighter2 (07-05-2015), karlej (02-28-2016), nipper (07-06-2015), outback (07-05-2015)

  3. #2
    Senior Member blabbermouth outback's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Akron, Ohio
    Posts
    11,939
    Thanked: 4300

    Default

    Very nice.
    It just proves, they dont make them like they used to.
    I think the washers give it it's own charm that sets it apart from others.
    Hope to someday find something that old, in at least that good of condition.
    Thanks for sharing.
    Fikira likes this.
    Mike

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to outback For This Useful Post:

    Fikira (07-05-2015)

  5. #3
    Compulsive frankensteinisator Thaeris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Paris area, Fr
    Posts
    967
    Thanked: 476

    Default

    In my opinion it was made later by a man with a grindstone

  6. #4
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Diamond Bar, CA
    Posts
    6,553
    Thanked: 3215

    Default

    Why do you think that, Thaeris, the hollow grind?

    A re-grind?

    Like the collars & deep stamps, in great shape, a nice find.
    Fikira likes this.

  7. #5
    Senior Member Fikira's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    476
    Thanked: 211

    Default

    I was wondering the same,
    an extra picture of its ground by the way, a nice wedge I would say

    Name:  DSCN3821.jpg
Views: 617
Size:  11.5 KB

  8. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    128
    Thanked: 118

    Default

    I love the stamp along the top of the spine! The point where the blade meets the tang looks to be so thin I would almost be afraid of it snapping.
    Fikira and engine46 like this.

  9. #7
    Compulsive frankensteinisator Thaeris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Paris area, Fr
    Posts
    967
    Thanked: 476

    Default

    The mark on the tang doesn't follow the "direction" of it :



    And they are usually larger on razors of this period. Plus it doesn't look like "natural".

    In my opinion it was made to mask an wear of the blade like this one :



    Made it usable again from the nose to the end of the blade, and perhaps give it a more modern form.

    But it's only a guess.
    Geezer, Wullie, BobH and 1 others like this.

  10. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Thaeris For This Useful Post:

    BobH (07-06-2015), Euclid440 (07-06-2015), Fikira (07-06-2015), Steve56 (07-06-2015)

  11. #8
    Senior Member Fikira's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    476
    Thanked: 211

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thaeris View Post
    Made it usable again from the nose to the end of the blade, and perhaps give it a more modern form.

    But it's only a guess.
    It is very possible I think!

    Maybe it was to fix a fault in the forging...
    Name:  DSCN3914.jpg
Views: 583
Size:  28.9 KB

    It could also explain the fading of the "Geo." stamp on the spine,
    Name:  DSCN3905.jpg
Views: 545
Size:  22.2 KB
    and the fading of the "+" mark, maybe some metal was also removed of the spine
    Name:  DSCN3915.jpg
Views: 588
Size:  28.9 KB

    If that is the case, in the beginning, it would have been more like this
    Name:  DSCN3919.jpg
Views: 1033
Size:  37.8 KB

    Darn, really thought I found something...
    but hey, they did a very nice job, didn't they...
    Geezer, BobH and Thaeris like this.

  12. #9
    Compulsive frankensteinisator Thaeris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Paris area, Fr
    Posts
    967
    Thanked: 476

    Default

    It's quite an ingenious fixing indeed (if it is one).
    Geezer, Wullie, Fikira and 1 others like this.

  13. #10
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Diamond Bar, CA
    Posts
    6,553
    Thanked: 3215

    Default

    Yea, don’t see those every day…

    Still a nice find, no matter what happened to it… it’s not a reground Gold Dollar. It’s all history and interesting trying to figure out, what was done and why?

    Makes it even more, fascinating.

    I picked this up the other day for $2 for the ivory scales, can’t read the stamp because of the rust, but now I think it may be older than I thought.

    In Ivory, it was probably a nice razor once.

    Name:  DSC02372.jpg
Views: 544
Size:  42.2 KBName:  DSC02374.jpg
Views: 587
Size:  47.4 KBName:  DSC02375.jpg
Views: 604
Size:  47.8 KBName:  DSC02378.jpg
Views: 558
Size:  43.2 KBName:  DSC02380.jpg
Views: 571
Size:  36.5 KBName:  DSC02379.jpg
Views: 548
Size:  44.5 KB
    Fikira likes this.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •