Results 1 to 10 of 13
Thread: 1908 Razor Ad
-
12-15-2015, 08:00 AM #1
1908 Razor Ad
Found this online. A newspaper ad from 1908 Chicago Newspaper. Thought I'd share it. Look at those prices.
Keeping my creative edge just as sharp.
-Rich
-
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to rbtek1 For This Useful Post:
AlienEdge (12-15-2015), Firefighter2 (12-15-2015), Geezer (12-15-2015), Haroldg48 (12-15-2015)
-
12-15-2015, 01:59 PM #2
- Join Date
- Jun 2013
- Location
- Pompano Beach, FL
- Posts
- 4,039
Thanked: 634That's what I was paying for vintage razors at garage sales in the 70's. I could always find at least one at a sale or auction. Now look at the prices and how hard they are to find.
-
12-15-2015, 03:43 PM #3
yea, look at what the average working man's wage was in those days.
No matter how many men you kill you can't kill your successor-Emperor Nero
-
12-15-2015, 03:57 PM #4
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
- Location
- Haida Gwaii, British Columbia, Canada
- Posts
- 14,442
Thanked: 4828My father used to tell stories about 25 cent pitchers of draft beer. You and you buddies could drink all night for ten dollars was what he said. Having seen him and his buddies carry on I doubt they could have gone a whole night for ten bucks though, maybe twenty.
It's not what you know, it's who you take fishing!
-
12-15-2015, 04:03 PM #5
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Posts
- 2,169
Thanked: 220It's all relative, as those prices were probably steep back then. I wish I had them razors though, thanks for posting!
-
12-15-2015, 04:22 PM #6
I'm not so sure they were steep even then. Without doing any searching on average wages - or inflation since then - let's say an average razor was $1.50 then and that razor is comparable to say a $150 razor now - that's a 100 fold increase. How do wages compare in the US today? Would I be in the right range that average wages are around $60k to $70k? If so, then dividing by 100 gives an average annual $650 back then - or $13 per week. You tell me whether the average was better or worse than that - my guess is the average man would have earned more than that in 1908.
My service is good, fast and cheap. Select any two and discount the third.
-
12-15-2015, 04:54 PM #7
There's the wages. Average laborer $200-400/yr.
Keeping my creative edge just as sharp.
-Rich
-
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rbtek1 For This Useful Post:
BobH (12-15-2015), Firefighter2 (12-15-2015)
-
12-15-2015, 06:06 PM #8
2$ then is equivalent to about 50$ today, so those prices are pretty good. However, as mentioned above the wages were very low at that time.
-
12-15-2015, 06:11 PM #9
Sure would be sweet to have one of each.
Keeping my creative edge just as sharp.
-Rich
-
12-15-2015, 11:22 PM #10
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
- Location
- Haida Gwaii, British Columbia, Canada
- Posts
- 14,442
Thanked: 4828Well not only were they wages a little different but according to the elders I know, not many people had much for disposable income at the turn of the century. That was not until much later in the century.
It's not what you know, it's who you take fishing!