Results 31 to 40 of 47
Thread: Preferred Steel
-
10-27-2016, 05:46 AM #31
HA HA similar life choice
I've always been wary of self proclaimed Experts
as I've always read it as follows
an "Ex" is a 'has been'
&
a "Spert" is a 'drip under pressure'
had a could of arguments from experts over the years when I have told them my analogy of their claims
but I do like the unknown drip under pressure analogy also LOLSaved,
to shave another day.
-
10-27-2016, 06:46 AM #32
-
10-27-2016, 05:29 PM #33
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Posts
- 1,898
Thanked: 995The idea of body fluids staining stain resistant steels is valid over hours, minutes on carbon steels. However, that very thin edge that does all the real work does not last more than minutes in a bloody living solution. Next time you're in the OR, see how often the surgeon asks for a new scalpel when cutting tissue. Human chemistry degrades the edge surprisingly quick and human skin is some tough stuff.
The idea of carbon vs stain resistant has been picked up in the culinary world too. Apparently the micro-pitting that occurs on carbon steels from food chemistry, not to mention that nasty black patina, is the perfect place to harbor bacteria that might cause an unsuspecting customer to have a cramp. As much as chefs prefer carbon, they are up against the bureaucrats in the health department when it comes to their tools.
Likely this same doctrine is why barbers had to give up use-more-than-once razors on their customers.
The "why" of carbon vs stain resistance has more variables than appear to the eye.
-
10-27-2016, 05:34 PM #34
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Posts
- 1,898
Thanked: 995The cost of steel in a razor is inconsequential when compared to the labor or the other materials involved in dressing it up (scales etc.) There are some razors out there made of CPM154. It's an old steel recipe but updated to include the sintered powder metallurgy that the steel companies are capable of. I have not personally tried one but know a couple makers who have sold a few with good reports returning on their performance. I would err toward "fine grained" when it comes to stain resistant materials. Chromium is a pig when it comes to growing carbides, especially with suspect or uncontrolled heat treatment processes.
-
10-27-2016, 06:00 PM #35
-
10-27-2016, 10:01 PM #36
-
10-28-2016, 01:19 AM #37
I was wondering if SS requires more effort hence a higher manufacturing cost. The carbide thing was also on my mind but I guess Henckels got it right with their SS razors.
When someone says fine grian I think of ,say, Puma carbon steel razors. So that kind of quality can be achieved with a SS at an equal manufacturing cost ?The white gleam of swords, not the black ink of books, clears doubts and uncertainties and bleak outlooks.
-
10-28-2016, 04:41 AM #38
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Posts
- 1,898
Thanked: 995The present state of metallurgical knowledge allows for very precise control of the grain structure given thermal and time controls. Yes, the quality has been improved significantly. You are correct to assume that more control equals a higher cost. I think the INOX steels have been optimized for straight razors. There is a point where good enough beats perfect. Those companies who make stainless razors are obviously willing to accept the cost and the results of their efforts.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Mike Blue For This Useful Post:
onimaru55 (10-28-2016)
-
10-28-2016, 02:41 PM #39
- Join Date
- Sep 2016
- Location
- California
- Posts
- 68
Thanked: 5
-
10-28-2016, 02:49 PM #40
- Join Date
- Sep 2016
- Location
- California
- Posts
- 68
Thanked: 5