Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 33

Thread: Stainless Steel

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    852
    Thanked: 79

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eleventh View Post
    Nice looking razor!
    (BTW-we could've also told you you did well had we known you got it from Joe....)
    None of us is going to sell you Pakistani/other junk razors except maybe to scrape gum from your shoes or with some sort of no-shave disclaimer....
    John P.

  2. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Peoria AZ
    Posts
    83
    Thanked: 4

    Default 440

    Quote Originally Posted by Eleventh View Post
    I have read that 440 stainless should be avoided, but that there is some stainless that is nice and holds an edge for a long time without much maintenance. I was hoping someone could tell me what the "nice" stainless steel is and how to tell it apart. I recently purchased a Solingen Stainless razor and am hoping it falls in the latter category. Thanks.

    There is actually nothing wrong with 440 stainless. 440 is used by very respectable knife manufactures ,yes I know a knife and a razor are two different things, Like Buck Knife. The problem is in the forging and tempering. Buck does not advertise that it uses 440 stainless. However, at one point it was known, therefor these second rate manufactures would advertise that they are using this great steel. This in turn has given 440 stainless a bad name. Again the true test of the steel is not entirely the chemical make up, but the heat treatment it has received.

  3. #13
    < Banned User >
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    3,763
    Thanked: 735

    Default

    There are also different types of 440 stainless:

    (from Wikipedia)
    Type 440—a higher grade of cutlery steel, with more carbon in it, which allows for much better edge retention when the steel is heat-treated properly. It can be hardened to around Rockwell 58 hardness, making it one of the hardest stainless steels. Due to its toughness and relatively low cost, most display-only and replica swords or knives are made of 440 stainless. Also known as razor blade steel. Available in four grades: 440A, 440B, 440C, and the uncommon 440F (free machinable). 440A, having the least amount of carbon in it, is the most stain-resistant; 440C, having the most, is the strongest and is usually considered a more desirable choice in knifemaking than 440A except for diving or other salt-water applications.

    From what I know, Friodurs are made of 440C stainless.

    Shaved with a 7/8 just this morning!

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    396
    Thanked: 4

    Default

    440C has a pretty high tempered hardness up to RC65?
    Is 440C a brand or a mixture.

    When I read Solingen or Sheffield I think of these as a place.
    Are these also standards for steel?

    Hitachi makes nice steels.
    ATS34, Blue wrappers, white wrappers

    What other brands of steel are good for razors?

    For scary sharp is harder better? Up to what point?

    -Bob

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    102
    Thanked: 5

    Default

    Chander has it correct. Being somewhat of a metallurgist I can tell you that each type of steel (stainless types included) has a solidification (or cooling) curve that tells you roughly what type of steel crystals will form by how rapidly you cool the steel (also known as tempering).

    In other words, tempering makes the single largest difference in quality of a finished steel product, after the actual chemical makeup. And since steel is pretty well coded by the amount of carbon and any other metals present, it's pretty easy to know what type you are working with. Whereas in the old days, the purpose of folding steel together, was not to produce damascus or pattern welded steel, but was rather to mix two types to provide a superior carbon steel (high carbon and low carbon steels mixed).

    If everything I said was too confusing, just remember: don't buy knives based on the type of steel only, buy them for who makes them. A better tempering process means better finished product, and you can bet that reputable companies do this reliably.

    Also some of the questions to Robert above me:

    "440C has a pretty high tempered hardness up to RC65?
    Is 440C a brand or a mixture."

    440C is a type of steel, not a brand, it stands for both the chemical composition as well as the type of crystalline structure that makes it up. In this case it means that it contains a low amount of nickel and higher amounts of chromium, though I can't remember the exact amounts. As Seraphim says above, it's commonly used in high-grade cutlery.

    "For scary sharp is harder better? Up to what point?"
    In general harder is better for edge retention and sharpness. Up to what point? Well until the steel becomes too brittle that it cracks when tempering, or under a slight amount of pressure. Also keep in mind that the harder steel is, the harder it is to hone. As with most things in life, it's about balance.
    Last edited by Droshi; 03-12-2008 at 08:56 PM.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Droshi For This Useful Post:

    Spartigus (03-06-2010)

  7. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    226
    Thanked: 44

    Default

    Just as a side note...tempering in blacksmithing and bladesmithing is a process that occurs after a hardening phase, to relax tension and soften the steel slightly.

    Also, pattern-welding shouldn't be thought of as making a 'superior' material that combines hard and soft. It doesn't really. More often than not it was used to compensate for the relative lack of control they had over the initial steel's chemistry (sadly they could not roll out nice even bars with the standards we have today), and to reduce impurities and inconsistencies in the mix (Japanese tamahagane, despite the hype, is NOT a pure material). It was also used economically in laminate techniques so as to allow very low carbon steel or even iron to be integrated in a relatively benign way to a blade (carbon migration through welding and thermal cycling allows some homogenization of fine layers in a pattern-weld, but not enough to cause extreme changes in a basic laminate) which reduces waste of the more precious high-carbon material.

    Just food for thought. Sorry for the

  8. #17
    Carbon-steel-aholic DwarvenChef's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Santa Barbara, CA
    Posts
    2,814
    Thanked: 823

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eleventh View Post
    Your title makes you hard to believe.
    What you don't belive me!!

  9. #18
    "My words are of iron..."
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,898
    Thanked: 995

    Default

    Here's what 440C can do for you. Brings me to tears every time!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWLYxlqc3gQ


    Sorry boys and girls, pick a better steel than 440 anything, for any "X-like" object (razor-, sword-, knife-)

    Points to Tierdaen for getting most of it right. Tamahagane is really quite pure once forged to remove the sand, glass, crud and charcoal left over from smelting, basically nothing more than carbon and iron with minimal minor alloying elements, considering the techniques are ancient. If you meant, as bloomed, oh heck, it's full of junk. Are modern alloys better, you bet. But it's made specifically to qualify for the requirements of the Japanese sword as a weapon art form. Is it special? Just try to buy some.

    Carbon migration is a critical factor in pattern welding that has been misinterpreted horribly over the years. For a layered bar, the carbon is homogenous by the time four welds have been achieved. Welding a high carbon tooth into a wrought/mild bar to make a single weld knife or axe will not distribute enough carbon to ruin either part.

    Droshi: Hardening not tempering. Mixing a high carbon steel and a low carbon steel would only improve the low carbon steel and turn them both into medium carbon steels. See comment about carbon diffusion.

    Bob: ATS 34 = 154CM, there are several very good crucible particle metallurgy steels (CPM) that come in stainresistant. ZDP189, any of the Sx0V series. 12C27 or AEB-L are also very good and I wouldn't be surprised to find them in many European origin razors if the truth were known.

    Chander: I don't know anyone forging 400 series stainless steels. At typical bladesmith temperature it turns into yellow sand on the anvil. Much better to just grind away what doesn't look like a knife or razor as the case may be.

    Dwarf: you think like I do. However, I've been using a Japanese razor, off brand, every other day for the past eight months and haven't even thought about honing it yet. It's some kinda stainless and I've been pleasantly surprised despite my normal affection for stuff that happily takes a patina. I'd bet its probably a Hitachi CPM or ATS34 type.
    Last edited by Mike Blue; 03-14-2008 at 10:18 PM. Reason: allowing for typos and confusion

  • #19
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Rochester, Minnesota
    Posts
    12
    Thanked: 0

    Default Stainless....

    Well, some of the best razors I've used to date have been Henckel stainless steel (Friodur) razors. They're forgiving relative to maintenance and I get excellent shaves from them. I think I've heard the stainless vs. carbon steel argument many times over the years pertaining to knives....If you use a quality stainless steel and heat treat it properly, you get excellent performance and edge retention on cutting chores. If you're talking about adding chopping, or prying to the mix, I'd go with the good high carbon steels. As Mike can tell you, they can be heat treated in ways that will give great edge holding properties and can stand up to darn near any abuse too.

    But if cutting is the intended use, the right stainless works just great.

    Knipper

  • #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    226
    Thanked: 44

    Default

    Hey Mike! Been a while since we last talked (2003 I think, at your hammer-in), before I moved to Taiwan.

    Purity is a bit semantically tricky. Are we talking about simplicity of the alloy or the lack of "undesirable" foreign material? The former is a much more objective definition, but is generally not the connotation of "pure" as many people imagine. The latter is a bit more common and subjective and is not limited to chemical, but also physical pollutants as you get in the kera (but as you said, most of these are worked out).

    I am mostly responding to some ideas spread throughout the razor community that imply that tamahagane (or steel xyz) has special characteristics that makes innately superior *blades* (in this case, I'm isolating "conventional" ideas of blade performance from all the subjective and appreciative elements that make Japanese art swords what they are). Rarity is often followed by hype, since it's hard to otherwise justify "uniqueness" in the apparently-discerning consumer. I suppose that the compulsion to justify with practical benefits may be a force much stronger and longer-lived than a few mythbuster posts, but I thought it was worth a shot anyway.

    Perhaps I should buy some razors before I fill these forums with my inane ramblings

  • Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •