Results 11 to 18 of 18
Thread: did I get taken?
-
03-26-2008, 02:45 AM #11
-
03-26-2008, 09:30 AM #12
Me being the devil's advocate again
Always sad to read that someone does not get what they hope to get.
I checked the seller, he or she sells all sorts of antiques and brocante. I did not see any straights so they might argue they found the razor in the box and therefore presumed it was a Henckels razor. They can claim they did send you the razor you saw on the picture so you got what you bid on.
Continueing as the devil's advocate: I checked with my Henckels and even with the blade between the scales you can still see the Twin sign and J.A. Henck.. stamped on the tang.
I am afraid that you met a seller who did not know more about Henckels razors than you did at the time of the transaction.
OTOH: if he's a half decent antique's vendor he may offer you a partial refund or a full refund if you send it back to him. It's worth a try. However my experience is that corresponding with sellers after the transaction is completed is far from satisfactory if you even get a response.
I am afraid you got to live with it as it is. Hone it up and it may be a surprisingly good razor.Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose. Jean-Baptiste Alphonse Karr.
-
03-26-2008, 12:53 PM #13
It looks to me as though the seller was right up front with his description:
"I recently picked up a supposed J.A. Hanckels Solingen straight. The box is old and is stamped as such. However, neither the blade or scale have any identifying stamp on them. Here is the link"
* That should stand out loud and clear, besides the photo with no name on it.
If you are familiar with J.A. Henckels (he spelled it wrong), you would be familiar with the Twin Works logo that should appear on the tang. As you can see (or not see), there is no stamp of any kind on the razor.
Yea, I think it is very unethical to give a name to a razor based on the box it came in, especially a str8 razor. The vendor can claim all the ignorance he wants, but my goodness, this goes beyond common sense, IMO. He did cover himself, though.
I'm sorry this happened to you. Try to appeal to him, maybe he'll surprise you. Otherwise, that's a tough lesson to learn.
Good Luck,
Steve
-
03-26-2008, 01:38 PM #14
Amazing coincidence. I bought a Henckels on ebay recently that turned out to be a J. A. Henckels box and an A. N. Other razor.
I suggested that the vendor refund the difference in price between what I'd paid and what I thought it was worth; which they did.
-
03-26-2008, 01:41 PM #15
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Posts
- 377
Thanked: 21
-
03-26-2008, 02:31 PM #16
Yes, when on e-bay the maxim is caveat emptor.
-
03-26-2008, 02:37 PM #17
I just got one that was the same deal, Henckels box but a no name razor in it. I was going to complain but for the $12 I paid for it I will keep it and use it as a travel razor. It was in good shape and never honed, if I gave $50 for it, it would be another story.
-
03-26-2008, 11:34 PM #18
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Belgium
- Posts
- 1,872
Thanked: 1212It's hard to swallow, when you end up buying something a bit overly enthusiastic only to find out that you did not buy what you expected.
I guess we've all been there a couple of times, one way or another. I know I have.
I don't think the seller fooled you on purpose, and I would inform him about it, even if it only serves the purpose of him avoiding such ambiguity in his future offerings. Maybe if you can manage to agree with him that you were both stupid (I apologize to you for putting it so bluntly), you can perhaps reach some kind of gentleman's agreement. Even if it was not deliberate, Ebay policy forbids to sell something that deviates from the description. He said "J.A Hanckels." That razor is not a J.A. Henckels, or "Hanckels" for that matter.
I hope this still works out for you. If not, I hope it 'll be the finest shaver you've ever bought so far.
Good luck,
Bart.