Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1
    26. Hatter Engaging in Rhetoric Mijbil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    246
    Thanked: 30

    Default Measuring razor blade width?

    Hey - sorry if this question seems silly or obvious, but I've heard conflicting things and am trying to get a definitive answer (or at least as much as is possible, i.e. a an SRP thread): when measuring the size of a blade, do you include the width of the spine? I.e., measuring from the edge to the spine, often the "dome" of the spine adds at least another 1/16" - does that "count" toward the width? I presume there *is* some standard rule about this, but I haven't been able to find it. Thanks all.

  2. #2
    . Bill S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Richfield, Ohio
    Posts
    2,521
    Thanked: 597

    Default

    The measurement from the top of the spine to the edge corresponds to the sizing nomenclature (6/8, 7/8 etc). If you are trying to do the math involved in figuring out the bevel angle you need the height from the edge (bevel) to the bottom edge of the honing flat.

  3. #3
    The original Skolor and Gentileman. gugi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    17,429
    Thanked: 3918
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    actually there is no standard rule.
    looking at new old stock razors, and i mean in untouched factory condition the official size is just an approximation of the actual width no matter how you measure it. there's a lot of variation.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to gugi For This Useful Post:

    Mijbil (03-13-2010)

  5. #4
    26. Hatter Engaging in Rhetoric Mijbil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    246
    Thanked: 30

    Default

    Hmm. Someone pointed me to a diagram showing the two methods, though it seems my description was clear. the creator of this diagram thinks that the "old" (vintage?) way was to measure only to the "hone line" and the "new" way to measure all the way up to the top of the spine.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  6. #5
    At this point in time... gssixgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    North Idaho Redoubt
    Posts
    27,026
    Thanked: 13245
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    That is not old-vs-new that is brand-vs-brand sometimes country-vs country...

    As Gugi said there is much variation even with the NOS vintage inside their stamped boxes......

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to gssixgun For This Useful Post:

    Mijbil (03-13-2010)

  8. #6
    26. Hatter Engaging in Rhetoric Mijbil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    246
    Thanked: 30

    Default

    Huh. I think it was Undream who made that image. Anyways, I guess there was a good reason why I couldn find a definite answer to the question ;] Oh well. Thanks guys.

  9. #7
    < Banned User > John Crowley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Ft. Worth, TX
    Posts
    611
    Thanked: 169

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gugi View Post
    actually there is no standard rule.
    looking at new old stock razors, and i mean in untouched factory condition the official size is just an approximation of the actual width no matter how you measure it. there's a lot of variation.
    There is a standard rule it was posted buy the guy just above you. The width of the blade is measured from the top of the spine to the cutting edge. The reason for variation is that France and Germany are metric countries. The blade blanks are forged in metric sizes. We adjudicate them into a close English size.

  10. #8
    < Banned User > John Crowley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Ft. Worth, TX
    Posts
    611
    Thanked: 169

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gugi View Post
    actually there is no standard rule.
    looking at new old stock razors, and i mean in untouched factory condition the official size is just an approximation of the actual width no matter how you measure it. there's a lot of variation.
    They are an approximation because they are metric blades!!!!!

  11. #9
    At this point in time... gssixgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    North Idaho Redoubt
    Posts
    27,026
    Thanked: 13245
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I seen this brought up before John, and I do believe that it might be "Partially" correct and some of the variance could be from the metric to English conversion, but not all...
    In fact this theory holds some water right up until we get to the USA, then it falls apart...
    Or perhaps the theory is totally correct, but Gugi is right and there is variance in the actual manufacturing process...

    But yeah the metric conversion doesn't cover it all..

    Just to make sure I understand you correctly though you are saying that a French razor that is marked 7/8 is really measured to 20 or 21 mm???? so that is why it is off??

  12. #10
    The original Skolor and Gentileman. gugi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    17,429
    Thanked: 3918
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John Crowley View Post
    There is a standard rule it was posted buy the guy just above you. The width of the blade is measured from the top of the spine to the cutting edge. The reason for variation is that France and Germany are metric countries. The blade blanks are forged in metric sizes. We adjudicate them into a close English size.
    Quote Originally Posted by John Crowley View Post
    They are an approximation because they are metric blades!!!!!
    John,

    This is just plain wrong! Here are two obvious reasons:
    (1) When Thiers-Issard, LeGrelot, or Puma stamps 5/8 or 6/8 on the blade, that is not a metric unit! Or perhaps it's just a decoration? I'm sure being at this way longer and also being a vendor, you have seen way more razors than me, plese tell me how many razors you have seen the size of which is marked in metric units. Photographs will be wonderful if you have any.
    (2) 1mm is about 0.3/8. If there was a standardized way of measuring where do the variations between (say european) manufacturers, or even within the same manufacturer come from?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •