Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 37 of 37
Like Tree1Likes

Thread: carbon vs stainless steel razor material

  1. #31
    'with that said' cudarunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Walla Walla in WA State USA
    Posts
    11,208
    Thanked: 4237

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ssmfc View Post
    I've given up on a $150,- Thiers-Issard Evide Sonnant razor, could have been stainless steel for all I know, simply threw the thing away. I don't know how many hours I've spent trying to get the edge back on it. It did very well for about a year (daily use, full face), but that was that. Followed youtube advice on honing (great info source), got the Norton waterstones (1000 to 8000), even got a 10K grit thinking that'd make any difference, but I just couldn't get a reasonable edge back on. About two years ago, I bought a $10 used carbon razor on Ebay (Geneva Cutlery, NY), ran it on the stones and it is perfect. I touch up the edge every 5-6months or so for a few minutes: kept the edge on for two years now. Isn't as pretty, doesn't shine or 'sing', but I can count on a perfect shave every time I use it. I would most definitely advise against stainless steel (or whatever TI uses for their Evide Sonnant for that matter), unless aesthetics are crucial, you're a pro at honing or you don't mind paying to have your razor maintained professionally.
    The next time you 'Throw away' a razor, throw it my way! I have plenty of time on my hands! (I'll pay the shipping) Sorry to hear about your frustration! I've yet to have to try to touch up my 18 year old son's 8/8 Friodur! (He's used it since December) It may be a challenge, but as I said I have plenty of time to work on it! However, if by chance, I can't pull it off, $25-$30 sent and received is a lot less expensive than replacing it!

  2. #32
    Senior Member rarreola's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    217
    Thanked: 33

    Default

    This thread is worthless if we cant talk about the steels types. Is not the same the 420 than the 440 or the 440C stainless steel. Whe have to know the steel type used in the straight razors. If Thiers-issard said it uses S30V instead 420 then I will bought it with confidence.

  3. #33
    Senior Member Zelenbakh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Moscow, Russia
    Posts
    411
    Thanked: 125

    Default

    This comparison is very personal. There is no best razor in the world, too many different views. For me carbon steel (Puma) gives the softest shave. I'm for carbon steel.

  4. #34
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    186
    Thanked: 5

    Default

    Something else to think about is that steel alloys can be optimized for certain criteria, so adding a corrosion resistant criteria could well inhibit its qualities in other ways. Of course razors are not high precision items that require exacting materials and will only be used in very specific ways. They will be dropped and occasionally mishandled and the like so that differences that matter in say a die don't matter so much.

    Could you make a steel that would be classed as non corrosion resistant that would out perform stainless steels, probably, but it might be impractically expensive. I remember hearing at work we bought a specific alloy block of steel for something like $3000 for a 1"x4"x4" block. But it is for tooling in our dies and as such has exacting requirements much more so than a razor does.

  5. #35
    "My words are of iron..."
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,898
    Thanked: 995

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zelenbakh View Post
    This comparison is very personal. There is no best razor in the world, too many different views. For me carbon steel (Puma) gives the softest shave. I'm for carbon steel.
    This really kinda sums it all up. The job of a razor is to get hair off. If your razor does that, what is so special about the kind of steel it has? Old steel, new steel, wunderstahl, unobtainium...it all comes down to the angle at the edge and the hand of the user.

    "My steel is cooler than your steel..." is common human behavior. Knowing that helps to drive sales of one maker's stuff over another's.
    “Nothing discloses real character like the use of power. Most people can bear adversity. But if you wish to know what a man really is, give him power.” R.G.Ingersoll

  6. #36
    They call me Mr Bear. Stubear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Alton, UK
    Posts
    5,715
    Thanked: 1683
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    I've honed both steels and shaved with both steels and I've noticed no difference other than SS seems to like a few more strokes on the finishing hone.

    Other than that they're pretty similar.

  7. #37
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    36
    Thanked: 0

    Default

    I was also a machinist for most of my adult life. There are so many kinds of stainless and each type can vary depending on the job. My first straight edge was a Dovo carbon blade (Bismarck) it shaves very well. I have bought several more Dovo stainless. They also shave well. I can't tell much difference in the sharpening. For a tool that is used in water every day it makes much more sense to use stainless. Stainless will resist the moisture better than carbon. Both types need serious care but the stainless does give one more resistence in its environment. As a general rule (not to be confused with a perfect rule) anything that sharpens easily will lose its edge easier. You will be happy with either type.
    BobH likes this.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •