Results 1 to 10 of 27
Like Tree13Likes

Thread: Are Filarmonica razors really that great ?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Razor Geek aeon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Posts
    240
    Thanked: 51

    Default

    While I have absolutely no doubts that they are great shavers, I'm glad that I think they look cheap and tacky. To me, they come off as almost toy-like in appearance. To me, they are just not worth the price tag, no matter how great the shave is. Obviously that is just my opinion and there are many out there who would be quick to disagree with me. It's all personal preference. If you like the way something looks and it's a reputable manufacturer and you're willing to pay the price for it...get it!

  2. #2
    Senior Member blabbermouth JimmyHAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    32,564
    Thanked: 11042

    Default

    I like the old vintage Fillys and glad I got 4 before they went nuts on them. I've never tried one of the NOS examples. Vintage or NOS, they aren't worth the price they are bringing on ebay now unless you collect them IMHO. Not as shavers anyway.
    Be careful how you treat people on your way up, you may meet them again on your way back down.

  3. #3
    Senior Member globaldev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    252
    Thanked: 38

    Default Jose M. Pou pre vs post filarmonica

    anyone have a comment on the differences between a Jose M. Pou without the fili tang brand (maybe pre-filarmonica) and the branded? not the DT versions, but a Medallion Tauro or something like that..

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •