Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Odd Hone wear

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Junior Member kennyloggins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Hampton Roads, VA
    Posts
    19
    Thanked: 0

    Default

    Thanks for confirming for me. By profile I meant it was narrow at the shoulder and considerably wider at the tip (if you were to look @ the blade from the perspective of pictures 3 and 4). The main reason I asked is because it looked like it was intentional... maybe to make it look like an early blade? Should any of that be maintained or should it be perfectly symmetrical?
    Last edited by kennyloggins; 05-10-2012 at 05:45 PM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member blabbermouth Kees's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    5,474
    Thanked: 656

    Default

    Most users of SRP would call a blade wedge-shaped if the cross section of the blade resembles a wedge. The heel being lower than the toe is problably due to amateurish honing as well.

  3. #3
    Junior Member kennyloggins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Hampton Roads, VA
    Posts
    19
    Thanked: 0

    Default

    "Before 1800

    Prior to 1800 blades and handles were wedge shaped. The Razor was wide at one end and tapered to a narrower point near the end where the pin was placed. The blade was wedge ground and its edge was straight."

    (From Standard Guide to Razors)


    Quote Originally Posted by Kees View Post
    Most users of SRP would call a blade wedge-shaped if the cross section of the blade resembles a wedge. The heel being lower than the toe is problably due to amateurish honing as well.

  4. #4
    -- There is no try, only do. Morty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    SE PA
    Posts
    501
    Thanked: 167

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kennyloggins View Post
    it looked like it was intentional...
    <snip>
    Should any of that be maintained or should it be perfectly symmetrical?
    It's almost guaranteed that was not intentional. Working on a 220K stone, you will be removing more metal from the mid-to-toe end of the edge. Try to just remove the minimal amount of metal from the heel end of the blade, so that the stabilizer won't begin interfering with honing strokes. If that should happen, that's fixable too. For now, just focus on slowly removing the frown.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Morty For This Useful Post:

    kennyloggins (05-10-2012)

  6. #5
    Junior Member kennyloggins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Hampton Roads, VA
    Posts
    19
    Thanked: 0

    Default

    I'm going to clean it up and try to turn the frown upside down over the next couple of days. I'll post pics of it fixed when I get a chance. Thanks for all of the advice.

    Quote Originally Posted by Morty View Post
    It's almost guaranteed that was not intentional. Working on a 220K stone, you will be removing more metal from the mid-to-toe end of the edge. Try to just remove the minimal amount of metal from the heel end of the blade, so that the stabilizer won't begin interfering with honing strokes. If that should happen, that's fixable too. For now, just focus on slowly removing the frown.
    Last edited by kennyloggins; 05-10-2012 at 06:18 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •