Results 1 to 10 of 13
-
06-23-2012, 12:26 AM #1
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- New Port Richey, FL
- Posts
- 3,819
- Blog Entries
- 3
Thanked: 1185Scientific Proof of Something We all Know
Electron microscope pictures: pic on the left is a whisker shaved with a standard razor, the one on the right is shaved with an electric
Conclusion, electric razors suck...DUH!
-
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 1OldGI For This Useful Post:
ScottGoodman (06-23-2012), Str8Shooter (06-23-2012)
-
06-23-2012, 12:49 AM #2
Very cool. Where did you get these images?
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it's natural manure."
Thomas Jefferson, Paris, November 13th 1787
-
06-23-2012, 12:54 AM #3
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- Brisbane/Redcliffe, Australia
- Posts
- 6,380
Thanked: 983Explains why me and my electric never got along together!
Mick
-
06-23-2012, 01:21 AM #4
-
06-23-2012, 01:25 AM #5
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Location
- Mid state Illinois
- Posts
- 1,448
Thanked: 247WOW! That's really something! I need one of those microscopes to check my bevel.
-
06-23-2012, 01:31 AM #6
The whisker cut by the electric razor might look rougher under high magnification, but imagine what running your hand over it might feel like compared to the one cut by a "standard razor". What looks cooler at a high level of magnification might not feel so good while we're faceturbating. Are we trying to be kind to whiskers here or trying to get smooth shaves?
-
06-23-2012, 01:50 AM #7
Well I think this has a lot to do with why a lot of guys have serious skin problems with electric (ingrown hairs). Those pics show that the electric just naws on it like a micro tiger while the razor is a clean cut. I think your photos are proof positive of why some skin problems occur with different shaving utilities. Just a thought
-
06-23-2012, 01:53 AM #8
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Posts
- 471
Thanked: 46Ewwww!...but hey..its the truth..
-
06-23-2012, 01:54 AM #9
-
06-23-2012, 02:03 AM #10