Results 11 to 12 of 12
-
08-11-2012, 03:44 PM #11
Jimmy is absolutely right.
That's why the Geo.Wostenholm company often filed suit against other firms with similar trademarks. This was costly but deemed necessary to protect their name. One of the first litigation in 1888 was against a Wm.Woolhouse of Melbourne for the similar trademark of "Non XL". While this action was apparently successful against Wollhouse, Joseph Allen made application to register a similar mark.
From the article in Knife World, November 1984:
"A razor marked "Non-XLL, Joseph Allen & Sons, Sheffield, England" looks very much like the "Pipe" razor . The brass pins, metal spacer, clear horn handle and the gold design are very similar to the Geo.Wostenholm razor. The word, "Dagger" and an illustration of a dagger, however, are substituted for the word "Pipe" and illustration of a pipe".Alex Ts.
-
08-11-2012, 10:10 PM #12
Not only are we yet again impressed by the Strait Razor answer guy manah, but he manages to pick up another thread (Wostenholm) that is of interest to me. Todays shave was a Geo Wostenholm & Son's "Conquerer" - which adds to the doo-daa-doo-daa que the sci-fi sound effects for me.
And manah's great notes help me date my B.J. Eyre "Two Fish" to 1899-1914...yet another mystery solved.
Thank you again, let us know when you are going to start your "Straight Razor Story Time" series, I'm sure you will draw a crowd.