Results 1 to 10 of 38
Hybrid View
-
01-08-2007, 04:30 PM #1
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Posts
- 3,063
Thanked: 9Very interesting, Michael!
I would not complain if the Puma steel is the better one (as I have mostly Puma, not Pumaster steel)
My Pumaster is a 6/8 model but actually larger 13/16. It does have the fattest original Puma scales I have seen (and I have had 5 or so other 6/8 Pumas). These particular scales were probably for the rare 7/8. When I first took the razor out I was like "Can it be a 7/8???" but this was just wishful thinking
Cheers
Ivo
-
01-08-2007, 04:31 PM #2
Ivo, it could have been a 7/8 that got honed down, especially if the owner used tape to protect such a beautiful piece.
-
01-08-2007, 04:58 PM #3
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Posts
- 3,063
Thanked: 9Ilija,
The bevel is very narrow - seems like NOS or very lightly used. I thought it just came a bit larger but was within the 6/8 tolerance range (and under 7/8) and the guy who was scaling it just put what he thought would fit best.
Cheers
Ivo
-
01-08-2007, 05:06 PM #4
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Posts
- 3,396
Thanked: 346That could well be. My Heljestrand #32's scales look too small for it, but it's at the very upper limit for a 6/8 so it got the 6/8 model number and 6/8 scales, even though it looks a tich odd.
-
01-08-2007, 05:28 PM #5
Ivo, a taped spine and no pressure can perform miracles. I chiped one of those 6/8 King Cutters and had to wear it down to 5/8 on 180 grit. The bevel still looks narrow and the blade looks like a natural 5/8. Even the "beloved" gold-wash looks centered lol.
-
01-08-2007, 06:47 PM #6
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Posts
- 3,396
Thanked: 346I checked mine at lunch - it's a #39, and it says 5/8 on the blade. Does yours not have the size on it?
-
01-08-2007, 06:55 PM #7
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Posts
- 3,063
Thanked: 9Yes, Michael - it says 6/8.
I hope I am not disappointed too
Cheers
Ivo