Search:

Type: Posts; User: Fikira; Keyword(s):

Search: Search took 0.01 seconds.

  1. Some further elaboration of Fox & Norris together...

    Some further elaboration of Fox & Norris together with more marks of Fox & Norris!
    https://historyrazors.wordpress.com/2019/02/18/fox-norris-p-more/

    :)
  2. The spine of the "1795-1800" is curved, and there...

    The spine of the "1795-1800" is curved, and there is a very slight start of a "heel"
  3. Well, this is a typical "Dip-at-toe" 1760's...

    Well, this is a typical "Dip-at-toe" 1760's razor:
    301959

    And this is a razor around "1795-1800":
    301960
  4. Neh, don't think so, the shape is really...

    Neh, don't think so, the shape is really 1795-1800 ;) :angel:
  5. I wouldn't be surprised if the combination "name"...

    I wouldn't be surprised if the combination "name" + "maker" was used perhaps in the beginning of ones career, until the name was established, and everybody knew which marked razor was from a certain...
  6. Yep :rofl2: It doesn't help that the son of...

    Yep :rofl2:

    It doesn't help that the son of Stephen is Stephen, and the father of Stephen is Stephen,... :p

    I just knew it because in the past I've worked at this for a while :D
  7. That George is the brother of the Stephen Fox who...

    That George is the brother of the Stephen Fox who is father of Catherine and her 3 brothers, John, William & Stephen (unmarried, all razor makers).
    After Matthew Norris & Catherine Fox and her...
  8. Hi again, A few things I've found when I was...

    Hi again,

    A few things I've found when I was browsing the Hallamshire cutlers apprentices index of
    "Sheffiled Records Online" and "The history of the Cutlers' company":

    By comparing the...
  9. Aha! Do you know where I can find such...

    Aha! Do you know where I can find such information?
    The directory of 1787 only mentions "*P Fox and Norris" and I've got no luck finding earlier references...

    As I understand it (Thanks to Neil...
  10. Maybe something interesting: ...

    Maybe something interesting:

    182709182710182711

    Could this be a *P John Fox BEFORE "Fox and Norris" ?
  11. 182352 Could it be then that the mark "S:...

    182352

    Could it be then that the mark "S: Norris" dates before aprox. 1787, when Samuel Norris operated on his own?

    Most kindest regards
Results 1 to 11 of 11