Search:

Type: Posts; User: JohnP; Keyword(s):

Search: Search took 0.02 seconds.

  1. Poll: Good deal! I always enjoy tangling with you guys...

    Good deal!
    I always enjoy tangling with you guys on here; even when nobody "wins" exactly.

    John P.
  2. Poll: Russel... No, they are related. Post your...

    Russel...
    No, they are related.
    Post your support for your claim. This thread is about God's existence.
    Likewise, while you have posted links to experiments in the other thread so far you have...
  3. Poll: Russel this is dodging the question. I did not...

    Russel this is dodging the question. I did not ask why sexual reproduction has been continued, but why it was *started* in the first place.... and while you state that one position is speculation...
  4. Poll: This may be...but it could also equally be argued...

    This may be...but it could also equally be argued as the mark of a creator. Otherwise, it is a singularly excellent solution to the problem and has been with us at least as far back as the dinosaurs.
  5. Poll: In other words, why the need for sexual...

    In other words, why the need for sexual reproduction at all. Single cell organisms reproduce quite fine without it, and presumably if we and everything else evolved from this, the program for this...
  6. Poll: So...just wondering why you think there would be...

    So...just wondering why you think there would be sexual reproduction instead of asexual...it isn't required in single cell organisms after all...? How would this occur by your explanation?


    John...
  7. Poll: ....perhaps you would like if your bank exchanged...

    ....perhaps you would like if your bank exchanged all of your money for blank paper and a bottle of green ink? after all, it could in theory yield BILLIONS if the ink only flowed in the right way. ...
  8. Poll: As point of fact, NONE of these have been...

    As point of fact, NONE of these have been observed. We can see the evidence of them, in multitudes (e.g. your photomultiplier reference) but we have never actually seen these particles which do not...
  9. Poll: Hmmm. Russel, you wrote: (emphasis added) ...

    Hmmm.
    Russel, you wrote:


    (emphasis added)

    So, if the evidence supposedly supports the existence of these particles (which,actually, have *not* been observed even with particle accelerators,...
  10. Poll: And yet....there are issues that science has not...

    And yet....there are issues that science has not been able to explain as yet.
    We mock ideas relating to the "supernatural" (meaning, of course, outside the normal set of natural laws) then in turn...
  11. Poll: I believe many people who do not believe in God...

    I believe many people who do not believe in God (Gods?) or even a creator of any kind, have simply restricted their views to their own interpretations of what they think"God" should be defined as,...
Results 1 to 11 of 11