Search:

Type: Posts; User: Neil Miller; Keyword(s):

Search: Search took 0.03 seconds.

  1. Yes, that's true. In this case it makes no...

    Yes, that's true.

    In this case it makes no odds though, as the surviving children are correctly identified in both sources - the discrepancy only arises in the amount of children that died in...
  2. Well one of them is evidently wrong, Martin! I...

    Well one of them is evidently wrong, Martin! I have re-read my source at least twice, and can only make nine kids out - but I am a bit tired...

    I took some of my info from the Fox/Norris family...
  3. That's because you didn't read my post properly -...

    That's because you didn't read my post properly - I said he had five sons, I didn't mention girls!

    Regards,
    Neil
  4. There is a little more to the *P mark than just...

    There is a little more to the *P mark than just Samuel Norris, Charlie!

    For instance, in 1747 the mark belonged to Fox & Norris of Westbar, Sheffield - not Samuel Norris but his father Matthew...
Results 1 to 4 of 4