Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Norristown, PA
    Posts
    172
    Thanked: 2

    Default TWO QUESTIONS THaT GO TOGETHER

    Earlier in the week I posted two questions, kinda taking my own little survey. One was, Ow may many menbers use a third pass and the other was - How much time do you spend on Prep.

    Most respones came out to be a little time on prep a and 2 1/2 passes with the razor. Or faces may feel smooth but they must be made of leather. Think about it.

    Most guys said little time on prep because they had no time but they have time to relather and shave again and then do touch up.

    Why don't we try a little experiment. I'm thinking of the 1800's when the men had to shave with a straight.. Correct me if I'm wrong but a lot of prep, steaming towels, lather, another towel. ONE PASS and a touch up.

    Try it for a week. I guess ll really have to concentrate on the first pass and not say I'm going to do another pass anyway.

    Let me know.

  2. #2
    Senior Member superfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Toronto, ON
    Posts
    1,950
    Thanked: 16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vincebell View Post
    Correct me if I'm wrong but a lot of prep, steaming towels, lather, another towel. ONE PASS and a touch up.
    You are wrong.

    1800's: Cold water (still), poor lather (cold too), dull razor (by todays standards), one pass (painfull), slap of moonshine, kick the cat, and ready for church...


    cheers,
    Nenad

    ...enjoying all comforts of today, not including multiblade razors

  3. #3
    The Hurdy Gurdy Man thebigspendur's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    33,042
    Thanked: 5020
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    If people in the 1800s enjoyed shaving and honing and stropping the way we do and got the kind of shaves we do and had all the luxury paraphanelia we do do you think Mr Gillette could have ever been so successful with his new invention?
    No matter how many men you kill you can't kill your successor-Emperor Nero

  4. #4
    Senior Member blabbermouth rtaylor61's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Salt Lake City, Utah
    Posts
    2,376
    Thanked: 2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thebigspendur View Post
    If people in the 1800s enjoyed shaving and honing and stropping the way we do and got the kind of shaves we do and had all the luxury paraphanelia we do do you think Mr Gillette could have ever been so successful with his new invention?
    I think so. For one reason. Convenience. Think about it. Instant rice. T.V. dinners. Remote control television. We are a society based on convenience and laziness. I sell a van that has three doors that open with the touch of a button, and has a navigation system to tell you how to get to your destination. Today, we want the latest and greatest. It is just the intelligent few who choose to go the path that we walk.

    RT

  5. #5
    Senior Member Justme-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Massachusettes
    Posts
    178
    Thanked: 7

    Default

    Ah, but 100 years ago, 80 years ago, even 50 years ago what we could afford had more to do with what we had than wanting the latest and the greatest. Henry Ford sold the Model T for $595.... it was Still WAY more than most people could afford so most people didn't have cars.

    Conveiniance is a driving factor, as is innovation but cost and perceived cost have a heavy hand.

    Think about how many men simply didn't shave or got a shave once or twice a year in the 1800's.... look at old photos.
    I would wager that shaving was a luxurious endeviour for those well to do no matter what the era until recently and the skills for caring and maintaining a razor were not that much more commonplace in the 1800's any more than they are today.

    I would also wager alot of our collective memory and interpritation of grooming habits from generations past are colored by today's standards. for example- We make movies of events that happened in the past. Real events, but we have no definitive exact record of what exactly happened, so we make it up based on what we think would have happened useing our knowledge and views. We assume there would have been daily dialog and happenings, so we create the scenes. We cast actors to pretend to be these historical figures and weave a great tale, yet we want themovie to be a success and forcing Mel Gibson, George Clooney, Brad Pitt, or countless others who make our ladies weak in the knees to be unshaven and unkept for the sake of accuracy in a role would likely lead to diminished returns because the "modern beauty" of these actors is...tarnished by their appearences.
    Movies are a link to our collective memory.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Norristown, PA
    Posts
    172
    Thanked: 2

    Default Two questions That Go Together

    That's excatly what I'm trying to find out. Am I wrong? Yes, we have every conveince for shaving that we can think of but did the guys back in the old days get a better shave than we do now?

    George Washington, was shaved every morning by his barber. Look at the paintings. Washington is about as clean shaving as they come. We know about the history of shaving but I'm trying to find out the history of how they shaved. I wonder if we have any old time barbers who are members that were trained with a straight razor. Not a Shavette.

    Reallizing the classes in the old days, the poor and the elite, yes, cold water, no lather. dull razor for the normal. But what about the Washington's? How sharp was his razor? Why are ther no more good stones left, not only Belgium's but also Japanese Natural Stones. A samuri sword was pretty sharp. How sharp was the razor?

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Columbia, SC
    Posts
    136
    Thanked: 1

    Default

    I do something like what you describe...

    1. wake up
    2. put the kettle on
    3. bring kettle to bathroom, pour into sink, mix with cold water
    4. splash, lather, shave (one pass)
    5. touch-up if needed, otherwise rinse and towel
    6. get dressed, eat breakfast and go to work

    I've also done this by the light of an oil lamp when our power was out, and it was still a better shave than I ever managed with my electric.

    I don't think we give the old-timers enough credit. Why should we automatically assume that they shaved with no lather and dull razors?

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    351
    Thanked: 1

    Default

    I have to agree with the last post.
    Just look at what has been left from the past and it was all done with basic tools and ingenuity and remember the saying "A bad workman blames his tools" most of these saying come from real truths, although not always true today. Most good workmen today, would be lost without their tools.
    We seem to have lost the ingenuity to make do with whats available.
    I suppose its not surprising with all that convenience floating around.

    p.s. With the exception of present company of course.

  9. #9
    Super Shaver xman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Lotus Land, eh
    Posts
    8,194
    Thanked: 622

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Justme- View Post
    I would wager that shaving was a luxurious endeviour for those well to do no matter what the era until recently and the skills for caring and maintaining a razor were not that much more commonplace in the 1800's any more than they are today.
    Actually, shaving came in and out of fashion from culture to culture throughout history. You might be right about it being a privileged habit.

    I thought the point of the suggestion was to see if we could get better shaves with more prep and fewer passes regardless of the historical fineries.

    X
    Last edited by xman; 03-26-2007 at 09:50 AM.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Norristown, PA
    Posts
    172
    Thanked: 2

    Default Two Questions that go together

    Both, Less passes through the use of the better tools we have than 100 or 200 years ago, or do we?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •