Results 1 to 10 of 13

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Senior Member medicevans's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    768
    Thanked: 99

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by str8fencer View Post
    I am afraid I do not have any solid knowledge on this matter. However, my John Barber has a different logo:

    Name:  johnbarber-logo.jpg
Views: 1360
Size:  23.4 KB

    I am not sure, but it seems likely they changed/elaborated the square/logo in the later period, possibly when technique allowed better results?
    Perhaps someone has better knowledge of their different logos will chime in.
    Lovely razor, btw!
    Could you post a picture of your razor with the full blade from the shoulder to the tang? I'm curious to see the tail profile.

    Thanks for the compliment on the blade, but I really had nothing to do with it. Lol.

  2. #2
    Senior Member str8fencer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Oslo Norway
    Posts
    1,848
    Thanked: 438

    Default

    Sorry, not a great pic I'm afraid:

    Name:  johnbarber.jpg
Views: 549
Size:  33.1 KB
    Tail seems to be shorter and fatter than on yours, but not easy to get a clear impression from the pics.

    Quote Originally Posted by medicevans View Post
    I really had nothing to do with it. Lol.
    Well - you bought it

  3. #3
    Senior Member medicevans's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    768
    Thanked: 99

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by str8fencer View Post
    Sorry, not a great pic I'm afraid:

    Name:  johnbarber.jpg
Views: 549
Size:  33.1 KB
    Tail seems to be shorter and fatter than on yours, but not easy to get a clear impression from the pics.



    Well - you bought it
    Very true!



    I have come to a few conclusions, to wit:
    1. Your tail is slightly stubbier, and the logo is not as detailed.
    2. My tail is longer and the logo is more refined.
    This would mean that my JB is probably produced later than yours.
    3. John Barber was in production from 1810-1834 per Lummus.
    4. Reference this page: http://straightrazorpalace.com/razor...ght-razor.html

    It would suggest that your razor was produced towards the early part of the date range.
    The aforementioned thread would suggest that my razor was made past 1825ish and almost certainly towards the end of Barber's business, 1834.

    So, that's my reasoning anyway. Whatcha think?

  4. #4
    Senior Member str8fencer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Oslo Norway
    Posts
    1,848
    Thanked: 438

    Default

    That would be how I perceive it as well, but it is hard to know for sure without firm knowledge.
    If anyone had access to records showing when the different logos were used we would know for sure.

  5. #5
    WBK
    WBK is offline
    never enough time... WBK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    82
    Thanked: 22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by medicevans View Post
    Very true!

    I have come to a few conclusions, to wit:
    1. Your tail is slightly stubbier, and the logo is not as detailed.
    2. My tail is longer and the logo is more refined.
    This would mean that my JB is probably produced later than yours.
    3. John Barber was in production from 1810-1834 per Lummus.
    4. Reference this page: http://straightrazorpalace.com/razor...ght-razor.html

    It would suggest that your razor was produced towards the early part of the date range.
    The aforementioned thread would suggest that my razor was made past 1825ish and almost certainly towards the end of Barber's business, 1834.

    So, that's my reasoning anyway. Whatcha think?

    According to a copy of an old Lummus article I have, your style tang was used on razors from 1833-1840. So that matches with sometime during the last 2 years of his business. str8fencers looks like one from the 1820-1833 period in the article.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •