I have been having a bit of time on my hands and have been more active on the forum than I have in quite a while. Now, I noticed some things that have been puzzling me, the main thing being the vendor policy and its enforcements. I enjoy the interaction on the forum and understand that vendors are part of it. Which is not necessarily a bad thing at all: it enables people to get in touch with reliable businesses in a niche that has new businesses popping up like mushrooms. I am perfectly okay with that.
However, there are a few things in the vendor policy that struck me as a bit confusing. Firstly:
I am aware that the review section is (sadly) no longer accessible, but encouraging vendors to offer their items for review in order for exposure may cause issues with those reviews not necessarily being unbiased, no matter where they are published. If those samples are paid for by the reviewer or a disclaimer is added that they were not then this of course would be a lesser issue, though.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendor Policy
Secondly:
I understand that the majority of the panel are not vendors, but nonetheless: is there not at least a slight conflict of interest of any vendors having a say in vendor policy? There must be at least five Senior Mods who are not vendors, I would think. I would be most obliged if any of the Senior Mods could clarify how exactly I am to understand this.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendor Policy
Thirdly, I was wondering why it says:
but then two paragraphs down it says:Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendor Policy
To me, this seems like a conflicting definition of commercial activity, namely 'advertising oneself outside the Vendor's Corner as opposed to 'advertising of individual products'. I am confused as to why posts concerning products that were unambiguously made/restored for commercial purposes outside the Vendor's Corner are not considered advertising oneself (even if the product in question itself is not explicitly being advertised). This goes for posts in both the Custom Builts and Restoration forum as well as The Brushmakers Alcove.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendor Policy
Also, if a person with a vendor status makes a post concerning an item they made without explicitly mentioning that it was made for their own use does it not in some degree imply that it was made for commercial purposes, as the EVERYONE PLEASE READ sticky in The Brushmakers Alcove explicitly mentions is not allowed?
Again, if any of the Senior Mods could clarify as to how I am to understand all of this, I would be much obliged.
Lastly, I noticed that there are members that seem to be vendors according to the Vendor Policy's list of criteria:
Yet some of these members do not have a vendor badge. I am not going to name names here because it is not my point to call people out (and some of it could be conjecture on my side). My point is that it seems to be an ongoing general issue that is in conflict with SRP's vendor policy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendor Policy
I preferred to make a public post out of this rather than going directly to Senior Mods via PM, as I think resolving my confusion in the public forum would benefit other users (including potential vendors) as well as the general clarity, transparency and integrity of this gentlemanly safe-haven in the straight razor niche. I am not looking to pick an argument or trying to challenge authority; I am genuinely curious, as these questions have been bugging me for a while now and I think we all agree we want to keep SRP an honest, level playground as well as a source of enjoyment as opposed to a source of frustration.
Also, a genuine thanks to the moderation team for all the hard work behind the scenes, I know it is not a walk in the park to do this stuff pro bono in your free time. We are all human.
Much obliged and best regards,
Pieter