Results 11 to 20 of 28
-
10-13-2008, 06:17 PM #11
-
10-13-2008, 06:40 PM #12
They way we see it now (but feel free to add your thoughts) is that the description would have to match the item. And that would be where the room for discussion is.
If you see a razor that looks like smurf, it could have a description like
'Old crappy razor. The scales are worth smurf, but the bolsters are in good condition, and the blade can be restored by someone who wants to spend the time. 50$'
If the blade indeed looks like it could be restored AND if the description is truthful, then the price is not up for discussion because people can ask what they want, and the potential buyer knows what he is getting into.
Otoh if that same razor gets advertised 'great collectors item. a valuable addition to anyone's collection, so sharp it cuts paper' you are free to point out that that razor has issues.
Descriptions should be truthful and are open to discussion.
And if the seller then removes and recreates the ad because of those comments, we will have alook. We count on you guys to bring such an even to our attention because we obviously don't have time to monitor the classifieds in realtime.
And if we have to conclude that this was wilfully done by someone who knows better, then we will take action.Til shade is gone, til water is gone, Into the shadow with teeth bared, screaming defiance with the last breath.
To spit in Sightblinder’s eye on the Last Day
-
10-13-2008, 07:51 PM #13
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Rochester, MN
- Posts
- 11,552
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 3795A recently notable ad that has been pulled and re-posted repeatedly seems to have lost the comments that were with it. Is there now a way that the comments can be pulled or are moderators pulling off comments addressing price objections?
-
10-13-2008, 08:03 PM #14
We are only pulling comments that are discussing price directly. The price is up to the seller and the actual buyer, just as in a retail shop or an actual classifieds ad in the local newspaper.
comments about accuracy of the description are allowed, as are links to identical items somewhere else.Til shade is gone, til water is gone, Into the shadow with teeth bared, screaming defiance with the last breath.
To spit in Sightblinder’s eye on the Last Day
-
10-13-2008, 09:10 PM #15
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Rochester, MN
- Posts
- 11,552
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 3795Yup, that's what I figured.
I realize it is not the moderators job to babysit inexperienced buyers and it has been clearly stated that the Classifieds are subject to caveat emptor. I hope that point can be made clearly enough to new members.
I'm just disappointed that last week a new member fell for paying $180 more than the retail price for a razor that was still commercially for sale at the time.
-
10-13-2008, 09:29 PM #16
It's not that we moderators are sitting in our secret lair all day, thinking up new rules for the fun of it
We try to leave things covered under the blanket rule of 'gentlemanly behavior' as much as possible.
We only resort to 'rules' if the other approach doesn't work.
It was the incident you mentioned that triggered this rule. We did take that incident very seriously, but at the time there was nothing we could do under the classifieds policies as they existed at the time, and the sale was made before we had the time to think about it.
The difficulty for us is to find a way to walk the line between allowing free market, and still providing a place where people don't have to watch over their shoulder.
By allowing comments on the accuracy of the description, and comparison with identical (or as near as possible) items at other places, we hope to enable this without breaking our hands-off policy.
Atm, the way I described it so far is how we envision this to work. As this rule is put to the test, it can be fine tuned or amended as the need develops and we get more experience with the dynamic of the classifieds. The goal is to prevent active moderation (other than as needed for things not related to the selling) and still inspire trust so that none gets fleeced.Til shade is gone, til water is gone, Into the shadow with teeth bared, screaming defiance with the last breath.
To spit in Sightblinder’s eye on the Last Day
-
10-13-2008, 09:37 PM #17
-
10-13-2008, 09:41 PM #18
-
10-13-2008, 09:53 PM #19
There was a couple of comments about a razor that was for sale that was the same model as one being sold at CS. I do believe it may be sold out at this time though. They went quick. In any case, someone asked if it was the same one as at CS, the OP stated he wasn't aware, and I provided a link to said razor. Now, this razor is one that many have been paying very high prices for, and considering that trend, the OP wasn't out of line. It just happened that CS had a lot of NOS,something about liquidation sale, and put them up for sale at half the asking price of the SRP poster. One of the mods sent me an email stating my post was out of order and had deleted it. The ad is still posted, however all comments have been removed.
P.S. This occurred yesterday I believe.Last edited by Ditch Doc; 10-13-2008 at 09:56 PM.
-
10-13-2008, 10:04 PM #20
Pricing comments on ad = not allowed.
Questions concerning ad (everything but price) = allowed.
Links to other razors (as long as pricing is not mentioned) = allowed.
Pricing comments via PM or email = allowed.
Removing and resubmitting of ad because you don't like the comments = PROBLEM.
Removing ad because you've made a mistake (and no resubmission) = ok.
That's about as succinct as I can make it. Just keep it civil and gentlemanly.
If you have a comment which you think might be out of line, please feel free to PM or email any of the moderators - including myself.Last edited by ByronTodd; 10-13-2008 at 10:43 PM.