Sure, the results would lack precision. That is the reason I came up with a graphical representation, that designates regions of interest to a hone, instead of hard figures.
We don't need scientifically bullet proof numbers. We only need a chart that is practical for the average honer. Who else can draw that map better than the members of SRP that gather experience with their hones on a constant basis?

Unfortunately, the only way to draw the map is to collect some form of numeric data first. It doesn't need to be very precise. The important thing is that the numbers show the correct relation between the hones that are entered.
If enough people contribute, it will be possible to see the correlation in their findings.

All it takes is 15 minutes to enter your hones in the Excel file. We could even try to make a PDF-version for people that can't read XLS-files. But if no one genuinly cares, except the people posting in this thread, I have better things to do with my time.

Bart.