Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20
  1. #11
    < Banned User >
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    3,763
    Thanked: 735

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JimmyHAD View Post
    I'm curious to know how the razor in the photos shaved following the stropping ?The edge looks somewhat chippy @ 500x. I have 30x and I'm betting under the lower magnification it would look quite smooth.

    It felt a bit uncomfortable.

    Before 2nd shave I hit it up with some Chromox, and it felt better.

    Take a look-see

    500x:
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Seraphim For This Useful Post:

    FloorPizza (10-11-2009), huntmol (10-05-2009)

  3. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    267
    Thanked: 21

    Default

    That last one looks quite nice

  4. #13
    Senior Member northpaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Athens, GA
    Posts
    691
    Thanked: 192

    Default

    I'm really curious how much the smooth edge in that last pic would be degraded by a shave. Got any pre-shave vs. post-shave shots?

  5. #14
    < Banned User >
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    3,763
    Thanked: 735

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by northpaw View Post
    I'm really curious how much the smooth edge in that last pic would be degraded by a shave. Got any pre-shave vs. post-shave shots?
    That is the post-shave pic.

    I shaved with it last night, and took the pic this a.m.

  6. #15
    Senior Member blabbermouth hi_bud_gl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    4,521
    Thanked: 1636

    Default

    how about a little lower power ? 60x or 100x.
    I personally think after 200x we just cannot see the edge. we see just one dot at 500x and that is not real edges pictures? i hope you understand what i mean.

  7. #16
    ?? clavichord's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    394
    Thanked: 159

    Default

    Very interesting, thanks! I think that comparisons can be done only if observing the same area (before and after stropping, or after different strops). Also, would it be possible to have one pic at 500x with hair and edge together? (..yes, kind of family portrait..) just to understand proportions.

  8. #17
    Just one more lap... FloorPizza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    775
    Thanked: 142

    Default

    I always enjoy Seraphim's magnified blade photos. They're like crack to me.

    Now if I can just get him to take some on a blade finished with .1 micron diamond lapping film....

  9. #18
    Member AFDavis11's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    5,726
    Thanked: 1486

    Default

    Nice photos. I think the 45 degree cut in the bevel on the faaaaaaar right of the first picture (before) is the same cut in the bevel of the center of the second photo (after).

    I will have to admit that the variance from before to after was not as dramatic as I suspected it would be. I usually apply a light powder coat of graphite to my daily hanging strop and avoid the entire worry over stropping effect anymore.

  10. #19
    Gunr
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    1
    Thanked: 0

    Default Neat!

    That's very interesting!

  11. #20
    Senior Member Kingfish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    1,057
    Thanked: 255

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FloorPizza View Post
    I always enjoy Seraphim's magnified blade photos. They're like crack to me.

    It makes me sooo nervous to know how you feel about seraphims micro images.(hopefully our addictions are healthy ones) Having a scope showing that much detail would be so cool to verify and help understand so many of the things we try from bevel set to different strops.My old 100x has taught me so much, but a 500x with that much detail is incredible.What I like the most is the detail visible in just how the edge itself is formed, whereas at 100x you really have to squint to see much more that the if you have a jagged vs smooth line.
    Yours on the othr hand looks into the detail of the edge proper.
    Did you mention what type of scope you used?

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •