Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: Common Rockwell

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    701
    Thanked: 182

    Default

    maybe Tim Harner is a brother

    i would bet that most blafdes fall in the 57-60 range and the new guys and custom makers are running a bit harder then that (think around 59-62)

  2. #12
    The Electrochemist PhatMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Hastings, UK
    Posts
    1,714
    Thanked: 527

    Default

    Samuel,

    After soaking at the right temperature, the edge is quenched first, then the rest of the razor is slowly lowered into the quenching medium - this leaves the edge harder than the spine.

    There are some videos of Mastro Livi doing this on the 'InterWeb'.

    For commercial, bulk production, razors, I do not know if they are treated the same; possibly/probably not due to the cost etc.

    Dovo & TI used to use (still do ?) molten lead for their heat treating process, so I suppose practicality would dictate that they would quench the entire razor at once.

    Have fun !

    Best regards

    Russ

  3. #13
    Heat it and beat it Bruno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    15,131
    Thanked: 5229
    Blog Entries
    10

    Default

    Imo, blades at 65 HRc are really not fun.
    Even at 62 HRc, they can be a bitch to get a bevel on and get them shaveready. 65 would be many times worse. So all in all I think 62 should be the maximum hardness for a blade. Going harder than that is imo pointless and counter productive.
    Til shade is gone, til water is gone, Into the shadow with teeth bared, screaming defiance with the last breath.
    To spit in Sightblinder’s eye on the Last Day

  4. #14
    "My words are of iron..."
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,898
    Thanked: 995

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam G. View Post
    Something to bear in mind. Do not get too hung up on Rockwell ratings alone .... Not meant to be more confusing, but thought another perspective may help explain the differences in performance between brands, and even different razors of the same brand.
    Regards
    A very good refining point in the discussion. And without ever having been to my shop, you correctly identify one of my practices with a new batch of steel.

    It wasn't until about the 1940's when industrial steels (big bucket stuff, the lab fellows were a little further ahead) were even concerned with chemistry. Before then, it was a matter of following more ritual than anything. Now chemistry drives everything.
    “Nothing discloses real character like the use of power. Most people can bear adversity. But if you wish to know what a man really is, give him power.” R.G.Ingersoll

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Mike Blue For This Useful Post:

    Adam G. (12-17-2010)

  6. #15
    Senior Member Tim Zowada's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Northern Michigan
    Posts
    235
    Thanked: 407

    Default

    Sorry, I couldn't resist jumping in.

    Don't be overly concerned with Rockwell hardness readings. The Rockwell C scale is only good for plus or minus one point anyway. That is by the specifications of the test. A blade that is advertised as 60HRC could be anywhere from 59HRC to 61HRC. A good machine, with a good operator can keep things to within 1/2 a point. But even then, things will vary on a given machine on a day to day basis. Testing against a known standard is required with every batch of tests.

    Rockewell C specs. call for a minimum thickness of 0.030". So testing an edge requires a microhardness tester (Yup, I have one). You will see those values as Knoop or Vickers with the associated weight used for the test. You have to be careful with microhardness readings too. I can pick out individual carbides and get the equivalent of 67HRC every time.

    Hardness values only tell you about the steel's ability to resist a dent from a diamond pointer, under a given weight. You can also correlate other things from hardness tests such as tensile and impact strength. On a practical basis, it is most useful for research and checking to see if you botched the heat treat.

    For razors, things like abrasion resistance, carbide size, retained austenite, etc... also come in to play when discussing sharpness, edge holding, ease of honing, etc. Hardness is only one of the variables. Hardness is important, but the other stuff is just as important. As an example, a 62HRC blade of 1095 is much easier to hone than a 59HRC blade of 154CM.

    Edges may be harder than spines, or not. That depends on the type of steel and the heat treating techniques used.

    The best, real test of a razor is to hone it, and shave with it. Lynn's correct again.

    If you want to jump in to the morass of metallurgy, a good place to start is Metallurgy Fundamentals by D. Brandt - Amazon.com: Metallurgy Fundamentals (9781566375436): Daniel A. Brandt, J.C. Warner, J. C. Warner: Books

    Tim Z.

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Tim Zowada For This Useful Post:

    Lt.Arclight (12-18-2010), vmspb (02-05-2017)

  8. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    701
    Thanked: 182

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cpcohen1945 View Post
    From www.customshaving.com , in a description of Tim Harner's custom razors:
    just to clear up a bit
    the site that you got the quote off of was www.classicshaving.com
    i am on there as Lloyd R Harner and Tim Zowada is the man that showed me the way.

    since it was quoted i thought i should make it right


  9. The Following User Says Thank You to L R Harner For This Useful Post:

    cpcohen1945 (12-17-2010)

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •