Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 27 of 27
Like Tree15Likes

Thread: Help with a High Gloss Tung Oil finish

  1. #21
    Modern Day Peasant Nightblade's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Denver Rocky Mtn. High Rent,Colorado
    Posts
    8,704
    Thanked: 1160

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pixelfixed View Post
    The reason is that real ebony is now considerd a non-sustainable wood,is a hugh black market for illegle ebony.
    Sort of like the african blood diamonds and poached Ivory.
    Some of the woods you see today are being replaced by almost like and kind,black wood for ebony, vera wood for lignum. they look the same, but not the same.
    right I get what your saying but.... I'm not talking about ebony I am talking about african blackwood. I think you were missing my point .African blackwood was and has been used for bagpipes exclusively as far back as 1200's maybe more. I speak strictly about the bagpiping world on that.And not the what's happening "now" reason for wood shortages. That's what I was trying to explain to you. "Ebony was not the preffered wood for bagpipe manufacturers".Although it has been used . And the reason I gave for them hoarding their stock is what I was told by top pipers and Some manufacturers/artisans ......anyway off topic. G'nite

  2. #22
    Beginner recurvist22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    82
    Thanked: 28

    Default

    Guys, thanks so much for all of your input, ill give the try oil a try. And thanks for the bagpipe information too lol
    Our name is Equality 7 - 2521

  3. #23
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    17,251
    Thanked: 3222

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pixelfixed View Post
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    I guess the easy answer as to why wood was not a traditional scale/brush handle material was that they did not have the modern sealers and finishes we have today. They used the materials they had that did not absorb moisture much as woods. I have not a thing against other materials used either original types or modern synthetics. I just like the grains and colouration in various woods. With modern sealers and finishes that is now a practical possibility that was not available before. Each to his/her own.

    Bob

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to BobH For This Useful Post:

    recurvist22 (07-31-2012)

  5. #24
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Roseville,Kali
    Posts
    10,432
    Thanked: 2027

    Default

    BobH
    agree 100%,things have come a long way for sure.Am seeing more and more stabilized wood products being offered these days,that may be the ultimate way of using wood for alot of applications.

  6. #25
    The Great & Powerful Oz onimaru55's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Bodalla, NSW
    Posts
    15,597
    Thanked: 3748

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BobH View Post
    I guess the easy answer as to why wood was not a traditional scale/brush handle material was that they did not have the modern sealers and finishes we have today. They used the materials they had that did not absorb moisture much as woods. I have not a thing against other materials used either original types or modern synthetics. I just like the grains and colouration in various woods. With modern sealers and finishes that is now a practical possibility that was not available before. Each to his/her own.

    Bob
    Apart from water resistance, another factor to consider is that traditional materials were more flexible than wood in that they were able to be flexed into a shape that compensated for warped/assymetric tangs which were common.
    “The white gleam of swords, not the black ink of books, clears doubts and uncertainties and bleak outlooks.”

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to onimaru55 For This Useful Post:

    recurvist22 (07-31-2012)

  8. #26
    At this point in time... gssixgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    North Idaho Redoubt
    Posts
    26,960
    Thanked: 13226
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BobH View Post
    I guess the easy answer as to why wood was not a traditional scale/brush handle material was that they did not have the modern sealers and finishes we have today. They used the materials they had that did not absorb moisture much as woods. I have not a thing against other materials used either original types or modern synthetics. I just like the grains and colouration in various woods. With modern sealers and finishes that is now a practical possibility that was not available before. Each to his/her own.

    Bob
    Quote Originally Posted by onimaru55 View Post
    Apart from water resistance, another factor to consider is that traditional materials were more flexible than wood in that they were able to be flexed into a shape that compensated for warped/assymetric tangs which were common.


    Bingo !!!


    One should also use the finish approriate to the wood being used, once you pick the wood use Google and see how others have finished it, some woods just don't take to a Tung Oil or a Blended Tung Oil finish... Some woods it really makes no difference...

    There are tons of wood finishing "Tricks" most every "Tung" oil I have used recommends a first cost sanding of no higher then 220 as it allows the oil to penetrate, a thinned down first couple of coats or "Washcoats" really help the finish.. If you do that and then sand in the next coats with 600 Wet-r-Dry you can get a very nice base... I also use a finger when using "Tung" oils I believe in the Warmth Theory

    Good luck

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to gssixgun For This Useful Post:

    recurvist22 (07-31-2012)

  10. #27
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    17,251
    Thanked: 3222

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by onimaru55 View Post
    Apart from water resistance, another factor to consider is that traditional materials were more flexible than wood in that they were able to be flexed into a shape that compensated for warped/assymetric tangs which were common.
    For sure, their quality control and their ability to produce to a uniform standard was not as good as today. I have had to straighten a tang. The old materials had their faults also, they could just as easily warp over time in an unwanted fashion. I have a set of horn scales that need to be straightened. Not much is perfect I guess.

    Bob

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •