View Poll Results: What have you found to be true
- Voters
- 26. You may not vote on this poll
-
Stainless Steel is more difficult
10 38.46% -
Carbon Steel is more difficult
0 0% -
Total myth I find no disernable difference
16 61.54%
Results 51 to 57 of 57
Thread: Stainless Steel vs Carbon Steel
-
11-01-2016, 01:02 AM #51
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Des Moines
- Posts
- 8,664
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 2591Stainless is more abrasion resistant than carbon, unless you are dealing with some mosntrously hard carbon.
For Stainless I know not bother with naturals at all, straight to the synthetics. I admit that I am stubborn and still trying on Jnats from time to time. Very few times have I had success.Stefan
-
-
11-01-2016, 02:04 AM #52
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Location
- Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
- Posts
- 17,294
Thanked: 3224I think we are talking two different things. When I said "non magnetic" I meant not attracted to a magnet. I just checked these stainless steel razors, Schulze, Herder, George Ibberson, Hess 44 and a Friodur to see if they were attracted to my magnetic kitchen knife bar. They all were attracted to it.
I am sure they can be magnetized but that is a different thing. Yes, they are extremely hard to rust but it can be done.
BobLife is a terminal illness in the end
-
11-01-2016, 02:20 AM #53
-
11-01-2016, 05:16 AM #54
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Des Moines
- Posts
- 8,664
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 2591I made my comment in regards to non-magnetic steel = more stainless. Stainless steel razors are pretty magnetic, so not that stainless by that feature, and yet do not rust easy at all. So, as you said, there is no need of extreme stain resistance for straight razor stainless steel.
Stefan
-
11-01-2016, 07:04 AM #55
I agree "it is rather hard to elaborate on". Chromium is/can be an element in stainless, but nickel and other elements play a large part in the desired properties of stainless. Some are more corrosion, abrasion, or impact resistant, or may or may not have magnetic properties, etc.. This leads back, I think, to the experience of the honer. If it's a harder metal like stainless in its various forms, or even a very hard "chippy" carbon, or an older Sheffield steel that may not be able to handle the edges produced by a Shapton Glass stone, the honer has to recognize and adapt to the steel.
Difficult?? Yes and No!!!
Experience drives the bus of difficulty...usually! But I think some blades test even the metal of our elite "Honemeisters"!!
Best Regards,
Howard
-
-
11-02-2016, 01:37 AM #56
The magnetic properties of stainless depends on the micro structure. Austenetic stainless is non-magnetic, stainless that can maintain an edge is martensetic and is attracted to a magnet. It is due to the lattice structure. Most Austenetic stainless is still ~82% iron and yet is not attracted to a magnet at all.
-
-
11-04-2016, 10:21 AM #57
- Join Date
- Sep 2013
- Location
- NW Indiana
- Posts
- 1,060
Thanked: 246Vic, Hi again buddy! Good to see you also. Good info there - additionally some of the austenitic stainless steels are commonly known as "3 series" i.e. 304ss etc. Some martensitic are commonly known as "4 series" stainless steels such as 440ss etc. as well as others such as 154cm etc. - if it's being used as a blade steel is almost always a martensitic.
There are also ferritic and duplex families of stainless steels.
Austenitic stainless steel is always either barely or not at all attracted to a magnet and not hardenable except by cold working (i.e. work hardening by rolling, rubbing, cold forging).
Martensitic stainless is hardenable by common heat treatment and is almost always attracted to a magnet. Ferritic stainless steels are attracted to a magnet but can't be heat treated.
Duplex stainless is basically a balance between the alloying ingredients that would normally make the steel austenitic or ferritic. Duplex stainless is the highest in pitting/corrosion resistance.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to eKretz For This Useful Post:
BobH (11-04-2016)