Results 11 to 20 of 21
Thread: Lapping Ceramics
-
03-06-2009, 04:41 AM #11
Seems you have the lapping question sorted but this may be of interest.
I had a problem with chipped edges on a Spyderco fine hone and everything made it worse till I used contrarian thinking.
I found the softest Arkansas stone I had, actually a white Waschita and sawed into that using a slurry of powdered household cleaner. Took some time & cut deeply into the Waschita but sorted the bevels without any more chipping.The white gleam of swords, not the black ink of books, clears doubts and uncertainties and bleak outlooks.
-
03-06-2009, 04:53 AM #12
I just posted a thread in the basic honing section about some open mesh aluminum oxide resin bonded wet/dry sheets that I used last night. One of the hones I lapped (although not pictured in the thread) is a ceramic from Lee Valley and it worked just fine. There was hardly any wear on the mesh so it can be used many many times as it is double sided too doubling the lonvegity of this product. I just use a small amount of double sided tape to hold it still and went to work. Good Luck.
笑う門に福来たる。
-
03-06-2009, 09:18 PM #13
-
03-06-2009, 10:38 PM #14
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Sunshiny coast of Oz
- Posts
- 211
Thanked: 20Zeth, I saw that thread, good idea there!
Kevin, the point of the lapping on the ceramics (at least the way I'm doing it) is to refresh the surface and get to fresh abrasive. the ceramics are so hard that instead of wearing to new surfaces like water stones do, they wear smooth, and eventually stop cutting.
I guess I'm a little different that most here when I say that I don't care if my stones are flat. Yes, I want them to be generally flat, so that honing is easier, but I don't need the super flat surface that most of you guys are looking for.
I also use the same set of hones for all my sharp shineys where as most seem to have a dedicated razor set.
But its all good, I generally break the rules, sometimes to my own detriment, but heck, I'm having far too much fun!
-
03-06-2009, 10:50 PM #15
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Posts
- 1,230
Thanked: 278
-
03-07-2009, 09:46 AM #16
You will find this out in a hurry if you spend any time lapping a Shapton (or probably any other ceramic) with a DMT while slurry is present. I've worn my poor old DMT 325 grit down to the point it could probably be used as a barber hone because the slurry attacked the nickel or whatever they use to bind the diamonds.
-
03-12-2009, 07:53 PM #17
My experince has been that lapping tends to produce a smoother surface on spyderco bench stones. So I would dispute the idea that you can regain coarseness by lapping fused ceramics. I could be wrong, but I don't think so.
-
03-12-2009, 11:11 PM #18
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Sunshiny coast of Oz
- Posts
- 211
Thanked: 20It would all depend on the stone you were lapping with, it would be possible to polish a ceramic stone to the point it wouldn't cut at all. I'm using pretty course diamonds and it does leave a scratch patten, but I don't see it as a bad thing. basically the way I understand it is you want to cut the top layer off of the stone, revealing the new sharp abrasive. As opposed to a soft water stone where there is a constant supply of fresh abrasive as the stone wears, and the lapping is to preserve/ achieve flatness.
It could be that you are lapping with too fine a medium?
-
03-13-2009, 12:14 AM #19
Well, I was testing with a medium ceramic lapped with a DMT XXC. The lapped surface is not as coarse as the new one I have (disappointing). Maybe it's working for you on the finer ceramic grits? (Either way if it's working for you then that's great.)
-
03-13-2009, 06:49 AM #20
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Norway
- Posts
- 507
Thanked: 95The Spydercos will change their effective grit rating based on which grit it's lapped with, I did one side of a UF with a DMT E and it became a much finer hone, than the 10-14K it's reported to be.