Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14
  1. #11
    Senior Member blabbermouth JimmyHAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    32,564
    Thanked: 11042

    Default

    BTW, the marker test is a good idea too. I assume you marked the edge to make sure the stroke you are using is bringing the bevel in contact with the hone ?

    I keep an eye on my one layer of tape and replace it if it is necessary but I don't go to that coarse a hone unless I've got bad chips to remove. Different strokes.
    Be careful how you treat people on your way up, you may meet them again on your way back down.

  2. #12
    At this point in time... gssixgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    North Idaho Redoubt
    Posts
    27,029
    Thanked: 13245
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Neil Miller View Post
    Ed - I usually use 2 (sometimes 3) layers of tape for wedges, but then again I start on a really aggressive hone like the 220 norton and/or 325 diamond plate. I dont replace the tape because it's reason for being there for me is to save excessive wear on the spine, not to make the job go faster - by the time I get to 6000 it's worn right through and any future touch-ups will then not require re-taping, which is nice.

    Regards,
    Neil

    So it is yer intention to create a convex bevel during honing????
    I know certain schools of thought go with this idea but I had never heard of anyone doing it intentionally using stones... Most of those schools of thought start with the straight bevel set, then go to just pastes, to do that.... I know Bruno posted some thoughts on this awhile back from one of the German Straight Shaving forums.....

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to gssixgun For This Useful Post:

    nun2sharp (02-28-2009)

  4. #13
    < Banned User >
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    3,763
    Thanked: 735

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Neil Miller View Post
    Ed - I usually use 2 (sometimes 3) layers of tape for wedges, but then again I start on a really aggressive hone like the 220 norton and/or 325 diamond plate. I dont replace the tape because it's reason for being there for me is to save excessive wear on the spine, not to make the job go faster - by the time I get to 6000 it's worn right through and any future touch-ups will then not require re-taping, which is nice.

    Regards,
    Neil

    Have you ever looked at these edges under a scope? I think things may not be progressing as you think they are.


    Having tape puts the pressure on the very edge. Taking the tape off takes that pressure off. I think your higher grit hones are not doing much to the very cutting edge.

    You can do the opposite--start with no tape, and then go to one layer for higher grit and get effective edge honing. But to start witha layer, and end with none I don't think will be effective.

  5. #14
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Essex, UK
    Posts
    3,816
    Thanked: 3164

    Default

    It works for me. No convex bevel, either. Just to make one thing perfectly clear - I haven't come across a true, flat-sided wedge yet - the type of blade I am talking about is so very nearly a wedge, but has a very slight concavity, so apologies if I have posted misleading stuff. But just in case all your crystal balls were working and you knew what I was harping on about, here's the rejoinder...

    The reason I do it is to minimise wear on the spine and to even-out any uneven bits/warps/bulges whatever along the spine. The bulges come through first, obviously, and get worn down. I check the bevel with marker (and also a USB scope, so I know things are progressing exactly as I think they are!) and continue to hone until passing the TNT on each coarse hone. By the time I reach 1000 grit there isn't much tape left, and I continue to hone to TNT one more time. The time it takes isn't the issue for me - the score marks from rough grits along the spine are. By 6000 grit if any tape is remaining it is covering low areas and not elevating the angle of the blade which to all intents is now flat on the stone.

    Others have remarked about the effectiveness of tape spreading the load along the spine (I can recall Bart pointing this out, among others) - most of the wedges I hone are smiling and have really messed-up bevels and chipping along the cutting edge, so yes - the lower grits most certainly are doing something, and if the bevel is honed to flatness by the time 1000 is reached, then yes the higher grits are doing something.

    As a point of interest, why would I want to scratch-up the spine on lower grits and then tape it on higher grits - my object is to make the blade look like less of a dogs dinner, not more like one! I want that spine to shine like a mirror, not be as dull as brushed aluminium!

    And to avoid any confusion, I don't manually take the tape off, so the pressure at the edge isn't an issue - I let the tape wear off. Once worn through both the spine and the edge are in contact with the hone - I've done it enough times to know it works and it seems pretty obvious to me what is going on.

    No more TNT after 1000 - just inspection under a high-power illuminated loupe and arm-hair cutting. Then finally stropping (I've even stopped using CrOx) until HHT is achieved. If it doesnt pass HHT back under the scope to see what's going on.

    I haven't had a failure yet, and I both hone for other people and for razor sales and for myself. The last wedge I honed got the remark from the happy owner that it was the silkiest, closest shave he'd ever had.

    Not effective? I beg to differ.

    Regards,
    Neil
    Last edited by Neil Miller; 02-28-2009 at 07:55 PM. Reason: addition

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •