Results 1 to 10 of 40

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    649
    Thanked: 77

    Default

    Eh... (first off, we're assuming everything is done properly)

    it is the variation against the face. it is that you can get distinctly different effects with different finishing stones on different blades. true?

    The fact is, the bevel setter is there to set the bevel. To get the edges from both sides of the bevel to meet. By the time you get done with the finisher all traces of the bevel setter and edge developer are GONE. The artifacts of the finisher remain.

    Look at it another way. If you end up with a properly honed/finished blade, is there any way to tell what was used for bevel setting or edge development?

  2. #2
    At this point in time... gssixgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    North Idaho Redoubt
    Posts
    26,987
    Thanked: 13234
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Quick View Post
    Eh... (first off, we're assuming everything is done properly)

    it is the variation against the face. it is that you can get distinctly different effects with different finishing stones on different blades. true?

    The fact is, the bevel setter is there to set the bevel. To get the edges from both sides of the bevel to meet. By the time you get done with the finisher all traces of the bevel setter and edge developer are GONE. The artifacts of the finisher remain.

    Look at it another way. If you end up with a properly honed/finished blade, is there any way to tell what was used for bevel setting or edge development?

    Absolutely correct there should be no way of telling.....

    This is why I think a larger repertoire of bevel setters would benefit the edge...
    Like thinner ones for smiling and warped blades, softer ones for harder steels etc: etc:

    Lets look at a list:

    Norton 220
    DMT 325
    Shapton 500
    DMT 600
    Norton 1k
    Shapton 1k
    Naniwa 1k
    King 1k
    Wet r Dry 1k sandpaper (argh !!!!)
    DMT 1200
    Shapton 2k

    Which did I forget???? let's keep it under 2k, even though we know that with slurry many others can be pressed into service also....
    Last edited by gssixgun; 03-12-2009 at 12:00 AM.

  3. #3
    Senior Member blabbermouth JimmyHAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    32,564
    Thanked: 11042

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gssixgun View Post
    A
    Which did I forget???? lets keep it under 2k, even though we know that with slurry many others can be pressed into service also....
    four more hones in the list that I don't have and didn't know that I need .
    Be careful how you treat people on your way up, you may meet them again on your way back down.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    507
    Thanked: 95

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gssixgun View Post
    Absolutely correct there should be no way of telling.....

    This is why I think a larger repertoire of bevel setters would benefit the edge...
    Like thinner ones for smiling and warped blades, softer ones for harder steels etc: etc:

    Lets look at a list:

    Norton 220
    DMT 325
    Shapton 500
    DMT 600
    Norton 1k
    Shapton 1k
    Naniwa 1k
    King 1k
    Wet r Dry 1k sandpaper (argh !!!!)
    DMT 1200
    Shapton 2k

    Which did I forget???? let's keep it under 2k, even though we know that with slurry many others can be pressed into service also....
    Fore some strange reason I've wanted to try the Sigma Power 1K and 2K as I've read favorable things about it's performance on carbon steel over at knifeforums.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •