Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 40
  1. #1
    At this point in time... gssixgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    North Idaho Redoubt
    Posts
    27,029
    Thanked: 13245
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default What is the more important stone ???

    Here is a thought I had as I satisfied my HAD last night and ordered 2 more stones....
    What is the more important side of the honing spectrum???
    Do you get more and more low end bevel setting stones, or do you get the high end finishers....

    I mean think about this, every single experienced person with honing agrees on one thing whether they be a "Honemiester" and get paid, or just very experienced with honing, the one statement that every one agrees with is "A sharp edge begins with a sharp even bevel" ....

    Now keep in mind that I probably do more restoration projects and repairs than most people so my low end is kind of important to me..

    You see tons of people that have finishing stones from an 8k Norton on up to 30k-40k, everyone seems to be chasing the upper end all the way to .10 diamond pastes...
    I was thinking that really it is the lower end that is actually more important...

    But what do you guys think???

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to gssixgun For This Useful Post:

    aroliver59 (03-11-2009)

  3. #2
    Senior Member blabbermouth hi_bud_gl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    4,521
    Thanked: 1636

    Default which end

    i think This is a little not fair question.

    To me both ends are important .1 depends to another.similar to catch 22.you don't have 1 part your blade won't be in shape it suppose to be
    My 2 cents.

  4. #3
    Senior Member blabbermouth JimmyHAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    32,564
    Thanked: 11042

    Default

    Interesting point Glen and you've described my HAD odyssey spot on. I have a bunch of hones both synthetic and natural. Knowing what I know now if I could only have one it would be the Norton 4/8. I can set a bevel and get the razor sharp with the 4k and I can finish well enough to get a smooth shave with the 8k.

    While the same thing may be said for the coticule with slurry there is enough variation between natural stones to make me stick with the Norton which is a known quantity. Having said that I sure do appreciate my DMT 1200 continuous diamond plate and my Shapton 1&2k and last but not least the Norton 1k. Which of the lower end stones I choose depends on the blade and how things are playing out with it as I hone. Nice to have alternatives.
    Be careful how you treat people on your way up, you may meet them again on your way back down.

  5. #4
    Rusty nails sparq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Winchester, MA
    Posts
    910
    Thanked: 159

    Default

    For me, lower grit stones are about convenience and speed of honing. I can live with a basic low grit set because I only hone a few razors and I can afford spending more time on finer and slower stones. Higher grit stones, on the contrary, cannot be replaced or skipped if you want the smoothest edge possible even if you have one razor only...

  6. #5
    The Hurdy Gurdy Man thebigspendur's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    33,036
    Thanked: 5020
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    I really don't know that I agree with the bevel part. I've had some razors that had bevels that looked like a chimpanzee had set the bevel yet they were wicked sharp razors that shaved with the best of them. I think an even bevel is more a cosmetic thing and is considered the mark of a honemeister when nice and even. Yes we all like a nice even bevel but I've found whether the bevel is so small you needed a magnifier to see it or is huge or even or or crooked makes to actual difference.

    Whats important is that the bevel is there and is doing its job.

    I also think people get carried away with this sharpness thing looking for the ultimate which of course is an endless quest for many.

    Just remember our predessesors managed to get acceptably sharp or better razors without all these fancy hones and alternative honing methods we use.

    As to the original question I think you need a balance between low and high stones. probably most get stones that do the job and as they get more razors they find certain razors seem to do better with certain hones and the collection increases. For me generally I seem to use the same few stones most of the time. But I don't think any one operation is more important than another. All phases of honing are equally important.
    No matter how many men you kill you can't kill your successor-Emperor Nero

  7. #6
    Super Shaver xman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Lotus Land, eh
    Posts
    8,194
    Thanked: 622

    Default

    I hear ya. The lowest grit I have is 4k Norton, except for my no name Chinese kitchen hone which is probably too coarse. Sometimes, no number of strokes on the 8k will be enough because the bevel isn't there. However, if you haven't got a super fine hone, you can always use pastes or even newsprint. ... I'm inclined to support you viewpoint.

    X

  8. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    882
    Thanked: 108

    Default

    Glen, I agree with you that bevel-creation is the single most important part of the process. If you don't have a good bevel you'll never get a good edge. Whereas when it comes to finishing, you might prefer your escher to your coticule or your Shapton 16 or whatever but any of them will do.

    Bigspendur, I think when it comes to those wavy bevels that nevertheless get sharp, it's less likely that a chimpanzee set the bevel than that a chimpanzee ground the blade in the first place. Subtle warps and other anomalies can make a wavy bevel unavoidable even for a honemeister. But as you say, it's usually purely cosmetic. This is because for all intents and purposes a bevel's a good bevel – wavy or not – so long as your two planes are meeting in a line. Putting a good bevel on a warped razor sometimes requires a narrow hone, sometimes a rolling stroke, etc. but if your honing strokes are making contact all the way down to the edge and all the way along it you've done a good job, whether it looks wavy to the eye or not.

    So why does everyone collects high-grit hones. Maybe because bevel-setters tend to be artificial, and finishers to be exotic naturals. Who wants 5 Norton 1Ks? Who even wants a Norton 1K if they've got a DMT 1200 and are happy with it? Whereas lots of guys can't keep themselves from collecting another coticule even though they've got ten of 'em already, or scouring the web for the elusive Water of Ayr stone, even though it's about the same grit as all their other finishers.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to dylandog For This Useful Post:

    JimmyHAD (03-11-2009)

  10. #8
    Senior Member blabbermouth JimmyHAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    32,564
    Thanked: 11042

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dylandog View Post
    Glen, I agree with you that bevel-creation is the single most important part of the process. If you don't have a good bevel you'll never get a good edge. Whereas when it comes to finishing, you might prefer your escher to your coticule or your Shapton 16 or whatever but any of them will do.

    Bigspendur, I think when it comes to those wavy bevels that nevertheless get sharp, it's less likely that a chimpanzee set the bevel than that a chimpanzee ground the blade in the first place. Subtle warps and other anomalies can make a wavy bevel unavoidable even for a honemeister. But as you say, it's usually purely cosmetic. This is because for all intents and purposes a bevel's a good bevel – wavy or not – so long as your two planes are meeting in a line. Putting a good bevel on a warped razor sometimes requires a narrow hone, sometimes a rolling stroke, etc. but if your honing strokes are making contact all the way down to the edge and all the way along it you've done a good job, whether it looks wavy to the eye or not.

    So why does everyone collects high-grit hones. Maybe because bevel-setters tend to be artificial, and finishers to be exotic naturals. Who wants 5 Norton 1Ks? Who even wants a Norton 1K if they've got a DMT 1200 and are happy with it? Whereas lots of guys can't keep themselves from collecting another coticule even though they've got ten of 'em already, or scouring the web for the elusive Water of Ayr stone, even though it's about the same grit as all their other finishers.
    +1 to all of the above but especially the last bit.
    Be careful how you treat people on your way up, you may meet them again on your way back down.

  11. #9
    Coticule researcher
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    1,872
    Thanked: 1212

    Default

    AH!
    The gender of angels. My favorite discussion...

    I do 90% of my bevel correction work on a Coticule:
    - because it leaves a bevel with a total absence of deep scratches.
    - because it never overhones.
    - because it leaves bevels without any teeth or other weaknesses at the very edge.
    - because the hone is always ready to go: no frequent lapping, no soaking, no glazing.
    - because it has such sweet feedback.
    - because you can get one as narrow as 10mm real cheap, to deal with severely warped blades.
    - because you can get one as wide as 40mm for a reasonable price, to deal with all other razors.
    - because both stones will be great finishers as well.
    - because you can buy more of them, and each one will be slightly different...

    Yes, I think the bevel setting hone can influence the final results, or at least throw a monkey wrench into the rest of the progression. I always cringe when yet another newbie has a go on a piece of sandpaper, in absence of a dedicated bevel setting hone.

    Bart.

  12. #10
    Senior Member AusTexShaver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    359
    Thanked: 72

    Default

    While setting the bevel is probably the most important step in the process it's less critical what you use to do that (and I've seen everything from valve grinding compound to a very fine rasp) than what you use for the final polishing phase...and that's my postulation on why most of us concentrate on the upper end of the grit spectrum when HAD strikes.

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •