Results 11 to 20 of 31
-
05-21-2009, 12:39 PM #11
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- Alexandria, VA
- Posts
- 708
Thanked: 171
-
05-21-2009, 01:17 PM #12
-
05-21-2009, 01:31 PM #13
This concept was foreign to me a month ago! And I have read quite a few posts in the forum, obviously not all but I am just saying Bart's method was new to me when I read it. Thanks for explaining and for doing the Norton experiment.
So how much faster is it to use a full set of hones on your average full hollow razor than it was for you to use just the 8k norton? Bart's honing portion of his video was only 3 or 4 minutes long - for someone like me who usually spends 15 minutes to 45 minutes just to hone one razor (back to the hone, back to the hone) it seems to indicate the same thing you mentioned, it is not so much the hone as it is the honerFind me on SRP's official chat in ##srp on Freenode. Link is at top of SRP's homepage
-
05-21-2009, 01:36 PM #14
Glen, Been there, Done it, tried it. I went to the Norton 220k, breadknifed, the progressed to 1k, 4k, 8k, then some lapps on the Coticule, etc....I think the Coti may have worked, but it would have taken some time IMHO.....I think there are better stones for the job, IMO, it's a finisher..I had a razor the other day with some chips in the bevel, I have a bunch of different Coticules, I didn't even go there, I went for the Norton's. 220k, I thought about the DMT's to get the chips out, but the Norton made quick work of it, Used the above progression. Be careful with those buffers guys....But Glen, you feel you can get a smooter edge off a Norton 8k, than a Coticule. Are we talking, stopping right there and shaving, or going to something else after that?
Last edited by zib; 05-21-2009 at 01:51 PM. Reason: spelling
We have assumed control !
-
05-21-2009, 01:41 PM #15
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- St. Louis, Missouri, United States
- Posts
- 8,454
- Blog Entries
- 2
Thanked: 4942This is exactly why I did this with the Escher, Chinese 12K, Thuringen, Nakayama and Arkansas Translucent. I could every one to take a razor from dull to shaving sharp, but it was not consistent with regard to time or the number of strokes. Did work though, across the board. Interesting that even with the Norton 8K, you can do the same thing.
Thanks Glen!!
Lynn
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Lynn For This Useful Post:
pjrage (05-21-2009)
-
05-21-2009, 01:46 PM #16
As business agent and International organizer for local 272 HADicts I have to ask you to cease and desist from spreading this blasphemy . At least a dozen hones in progressive grits with glass bottoms and Japanese kanji on top are recommended for honing a razor. It is in the Wiki...... I can't find the link right now but as soon as I do I will post it.
Be careful how you treat people on your way up, you may meet them again on your way back down.
-
05-21-2009, 01:52 PM #17
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- Alexandria, VA
- Posts
- 708
Thanked: 171
-
05-21-2009, 02:25 PM #18
Thanks for the effort and for posting Glen. Early on Randydance told me that you could set a bevel with a 4k Norton but a 1k would be faster. If the edge was in decent shape to begin with the 4k might be preferable as the 1k would leave deeper scratches to clean up with the 4k. So when the do it all with the coticule thread came up I was resistant to the idea because i have the 1k Norton, and the DMTE for the grunt work. So now we know that the whole operation can be performed with one 8k or higher finishing stone and that is great if that is all you have. I did it with a coticule/slurry once just to prove to myself that I could but in the future this home boy will be reaching for the DMT when it is bevel setting time. Many thanks to Lynn for clearing the land and building the runway in this straight razor shaving hobby.
Be careful how you treat people on your way up, you may meet them again on your way back down.
-
05-21-2009, 02:54 PM #19
-
05-21-2009, 02:59 PM #20